Quantum Control System Pausing Operations for Noise Mitigation

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Quantum computing devices face challenges in maintaining coherence and fault tolerance due to noise interference from various sources, which can lead to errors and interruptions in quantum operations.

Innovation Solution

A system that determines the status signal of a quantum computing device relative to its noise value, estimates operation time, and controls the device by pausing or resuming operations based on this analysis, using a combination of machine learning and checkpointing to minimize decoherence and optimize computational cycles.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Productivity

If quantum operations are continuously executed without interruption, then productivity is improved, but reliability deteriorates due to noise-induced errors and decoherence

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvequantum operation throughputVSAvoidquantum operation accuracy
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The system implements periodic status signal measurements and operation time estimations during quantum computation. The controlling component periodically evaluates the relation between status signals and noise values, pausing operations at predetermined intervals when decoherence is predicted, thereby balancing continuous productivity with periodic reliability checks

Inventive Principle:
Principle #19Periodic action

Solution Approach 2:

The operation time estimator predicts decoherence events before they occur by analyzing the relation of status signals to noise values. This preliminary prediction allows the controlling component to pause quantum operations in advance, preventing noise-induced errors before they compromise computational accuracy

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

2Productivity

If operation time is extended to complete complex quantum computations, then productivity is improved, but reliability worsens due to increased exposure to noise and decoherence

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecomputation completion capabilityVSAvoidquantum state stability
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs preliminary estimation of operation time based on the relation of status signals to noise values before initiating long-duration quantum computations. This allows advance planning of pause points and checkpoint placements to maintain reliability throughout extended computational sequences

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The system continuously monitors status signals during quantum operations and compares them against noise values. This feedback mechanism allows dynamic adjustment of operation timing, pausing when the relation indicates high decoherence risk, and resuming when conditions improve, thereby maintaining reliability throughout extended computations

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

3Reliability

If frequent status signal measurements are performed to predict decoherence, then reliability is improved, but use of energy increases due to continuous monitoring

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedecoherence prediction accuracyVSAvoidmonitoring energy consumption
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSUse of energy by moving object

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs status signal measurements at predetermined intervals rather than continuously, conducting partial monitoring sufficient to predict decoherence events. This interval-based approach provides adequate reliability for detecting significant noise changes while reducing energy consumption compared to continuous monitoring

Inventive Principle:
Principle #16Partial or excessive action

Solution Approach 2:

The operation time estimator uses preliminary analysis of status signal relations to noise values to predict when decoherence is likely to occur. This allows the system to concentrate monitoring efforts at critical time points rather than uniformly across all operation time, reducing overall energy usage while maintaining prediction accuracy

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Data Source

PatentUS11544613B2Controlling a quantum computing device based on predicted operation time
Publication Date: 2023.01.03 INTERNATIONAL BUSINESS MACHINE CORPORATION
  • US11544613B2 patent drawing
  • US11544613B2 patent drawing
  • US11544613B2 patent drawing

AI summary

Systems, computer-implemented methods, and computer program products that can facilitate determining a state of a qubit are described. According to an embodiment, a system can comprise a memory that stores computer executable components and a processor that executes the computer executable components stored in the memory. The computer executable components can comprise a relation determining component that can determine relation of a status signal of a quantum computing device to a noise value of the quantum computing device. The system can further include an operation time estimator that can estimate an operation time for the quantum computing device based on the relation of the status signal to the noise value.