Quantum-Counting Radiation Detector Parallel Signal Processing

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Quantum-counting x-ray detectors face conflicting requirements between pixel size for high flux response and energy resolution, leading to unwanted effects like charge sharing and K-escape, which compromise measurement accuracy and spatial resolution.

Innovation Solution

A quantum-counting radiation detector with two processing stages, where detector elements are grouped into larger units for signal summation and individual processing, allowing for flexible weighting of count results to minimize unwanted effects and optimize high flux response and energy resolution.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Productivity

If the pixel size is made small to improve high flux response and reduce pile-up effect, then the probability of pile-up effect is reduced, but charge sharing and K-escape effects increase significantly

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvehigh flux responseVSAvoidenergy resolution
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSMeasurement precision

Solution Approach 1:

The patent combines multiple adjacent detector elements (pixels) to form a larger detector unit with shared readout electronics. This merging approach allows the detector unit to function as a larger pixel for high flux response while maintaining the ability to process signals from individual smaller pixels, thereby resolving the contradiction between small pixel size for high flux response and large pixel size for good energy resolution.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

Solution Approach 2:

The detector unit is designed to perform multiple functions: it can operate as a single large pixel for high flux conditions, or as multiple smaller pixels for conditions requiring better energy resolution. The shared readout electronics and signal processing capabilities enable this multi-functionality, allowing the same hardware to adapt to different measurement requirements.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

2Measurement precision

If the pixel size is made large to improve energy resolution and reduce charge sharing, then the energy resolution is improved, but the high flux response capability deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveenergy resolutionVSAvoidhigh flux response
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

Multiple detector elements are merged into a single detector unit that shares readout electronics, creating a hybrid structure that combines the benefits of both large and small pixels. The physical arrangement allows large effective area for high flux response while maintaining signal processing capabilities for good energy resolution.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

Solution Approach 2:

The detector unit dynamically adapts its effective pixel size based on operating conditions. By adjusting how the signals from individual detector elements are combined and processed, the system can optimize between high flux response and energy resolution requirements in real-time, making the pixel size effectively dynamic rather than fixed.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

3Productivity

If multiple detector elements are combined to form larger detector units, then the high flux response is improved, but the unwanted effects of charge sharing and K-escape cannot be determined and corrected

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvehigh flux responseVSAvoidmeasurement accuracy
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSMeasurement precision

Solution Approach 1:

The detector unit incorporates feedback mechanisms where the shared readout electronics continuously monitor and analyze signals from all detector elements. This feedback allows the system to identify and correct for charge sharing and K-escape effects by comparing the combined signal with individual element signals, thereby maintaining measurement accuracy while benefiting from the large effective area.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Solution Approach 2:

The shared readout electronics act as an intermediary between the multiple detector elements and the final measurement output. This intermediary component processes signals from all elements, applies correction algorithms for charge sharing and K-escape, and produces the final corrected measurement, thereby enabling both large detector unit operation and accurate measurement.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

This approach enables more flexible adaptation to application-specific requirements, reducing the influence of unwanted effects and improving detector performance by combining count results with a weighting function based on paralysis curves, thereby enhancing both high flux response and energy resolution.

Implementation Method 1

an array of detector elements, which each generate a charge quantity as a function of the energy of incident radiation quanta

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectPhotoelectric effect: Photoelectric Effect

Data Source

PatentUS9057791B2Quantum-counting radiation detector
Publication Date: 2015.06.16 SIEMENS HEALTHINEERS AG
  • US9057791B2 patent drawing
  • US9057791B2 patent drawing
  • US9057791B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A quantum-counting radiation detector in which signals of individual pixels and signals of combined pixels are evaluated in parallel processing branches and count results are combined in an appropriate manner, thereby reducing the influence of unwanted interference effects for the respective application.