Quantum Processor Domain Calibration for Multi-Qubit Bring-Up

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current quantum computing systems face challenges in efficiently and accurately initializing and calibrating large-scale superconducting quantum circuits, particularly in identifying optimal operating parameters and characterizing devices for reliable quantum computation.

Innovation Solution

A calibration process is implemented that utilizes design parameters and measured values to automate the determination of operating parameters for multi-qubit systems, subdividing complex characterization tasks into scalable sub-processing units, and dispatching bring-up instructions to assess and tune quantum logic gates within a quantum computing system.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Measurement precision

If manual calibration methods are used for quantum computing systems, then accuracy in identifying optimal operating parameters can be achieved, but the process becomes time-consuming and inefficient for large-scale systems

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveaccuracy in identifying optimal operating parametersVSAvoidcalibration time
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs self-calibration by automatically determining operating parameters through a computer-implemented process that uses measured values from the quantum computing system to calculate optimal parameters without requiring manual intervention, thereby maintaining accuracy while reducing calibration time

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Solution Approach 2:

The calibration process automatically adjusts operating parameters based on measured values and calculated relationships, transforming the manual parameter-tuning process into an automated parameter-optimization process that maintains precision while significantly reducing the time required

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

2Reliability

If comprehensive characterization tasks are performed on large-scale quantum systems, then complete device assessment can be achieved, but the complexity of the calibration process increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedevice characterization completenessVSAvoidcalibration process complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The comprehensive characterization task is divided into discrete, automated measurement steps and calculation steps that can be systematically executed by the computer-implemented process, maintaining complete device assessment while managing complexity through structured segmentation of the calibration workflow

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The system uses measured values obtained from the quantum computing system to automatically calculate and adjust operating parameters, creating a closed-loop feedback mechanism that ensures complete characterization while automating the complex decision-making process previously requiring manual intervention

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

3Productivity

If automated calibration processes are implemented, then efficiency and speed of initialization can be improved, but accuracy in determining optimal parameters may be compromised

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveinitialization efficiencyVSAvoidaccuracy in determining optimal parameters
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSMeasurement precision

Solution Approach 1:

The automated process determines optimal operating parameters through self-contained calculations based on measured values from the quantum system, eliminating the need for manual parameter tuning while maintaining accuracy through algorithmic optimization that systematically explores the parameter space

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Solution Approach 2:

The system automatically varies and optimizes operating parameters through calculated relationships between measured values and optimal settings, transforming manual parameter adjustment into an automated parameter-optimization process that maintains precision while significantly improving initialization efficiency

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

This approach enables efficient and accurate initialization and characterization of quantum computing systems, facilitating rapid identification of optimal operating conditions and improving the reliability of quantum computations by automating the calibration process and subdividing tasks for large-scale systems.

Implementation Method 1

qubits are implemented in superconducting circuits. The qubits can be implemented, for example, in circuit devices that include Josephson junctions

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectJosephson effect: Josephson Effect

Data Source

PatentUS11977956B2Performing a calibration process in a quantum computing system
Publication Date: 2024.05.07 RIGETTI & CO INC
  • US11977956B2 patent drawing
  • US11977956B2 patent drawing
  • US11977956B2 patent drawing

AI summary

In a general aspect, calibration is performed in a quantum computing system. In some cases, domains of a quantum computing system are identified, where the domains include respective domain control subsystems and respective subsets of quantum circuit devices in a quantum processor of the quantum computing system. Sets of measurements are obtained from one of the domains and stored in memory. Device characteristics of the quantum circuit devices of the domain are obtained based on the set of measurements, and the device characteristics are stored in a memory of the control system. Quantum logic control parameters for the subset of quantum circuit devices of the domain are obtained based on the set of measurements and stored in memory.