Quantum Processor Domain Calibration for Scalable Qubit Tune-Up

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing quantum computing systems face challenges in efficiently and accurately initializing devices and operations, particularly in large-scale superconducting quantum circuits, due to complex characterization processes that are difficult to scale and require precise calibration.

Innovation Solution

A calibration process is implemented that utilizes design parameters, measured values, and automatic optimization to determine operating parameters for multi-qubit systems, subdividing tasks into sub-processing units and applying a defined pass/fail criteria to efficiently characterize and tune up quantum logic gates.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Measurement precision

If complex characterization processes are used to accurately initialize quantum devices, then measurement precision is improved, but device complexity increases and scalability deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveinitialization accuracyVSAvoidcharacterization process complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The calibration process is divided into multiple domains, with each domain containing specific qubits and associated control systems. This segmentation allows independent calibration of each domain, reducing the overall complexity of characterizing the entire quantum system while maintaining accurate initialization through systematic domain-by-domain optimization

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

2Productivity

If automated optimization is implemented to improve calibration efficiency, then productivity increases, but system complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecalibration efficiencyVSAvoidcontrol system complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The quantum computing system performs self-calibration through automated optimization processes that adjust control parameters without requiring external intervention. The system uses measured values from quantum operations to automatically determine optimal operating parameters, improving calibration efficiency while managing complexity through self-contained control loops within each domain

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Solution Approach 2:

The calibration process implements feedback mechanisms where measured values from quantum operations are used to adjust and optimize control parameters. This feedback loop enables automated optimization by continuously monitoring system performance and adjusting parameters to achieve desired calibration targets, thereby improving productivity through iterative self-correction

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

3Manufacturing precision

If design parameters and measured values are integrated for automatic optimization, then manufacturing precision is improved, but loss of information increases due to data processing requirements

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveoperating parameter precisionVSAvoiddata processing overhead
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSLoss of information

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs preliminary calibration measurements to establish design parameters and measured values before actual quantum operations. This preliminary action creates a baseline dataset that is processed to determine optimal operating parameters, reducing the need for extensive data processing during runtime operations and minimizing information loss through efficient pre-computation of calibration constants

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

This approach enables rapid characterization and efficient tuning of large-scale quantum computing systems, ensuring high-fidelity control and measurement operations, and achieving fault-tolerant quantum computation.

Implementation Method 1

In some quantum computing architectures, qubits are implemented in superconducting circuits

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectSuperconductivity: Superconductivity

Implementation Method 2

The qubits can be implemented, for example, in circuit devices that include Josephson junctions

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectJosephson effect: Josephson Effect

Data Source

PatentUS12591800B2Performing a calibration process in a quantum computing system
Publication Date: 2026.03.31 RIGETTI & CO INC
  • US12591800B2 patent drawing
  • US12591800B2 patent drawing
  • US12591800B2 patent drawing

AI summary

In a general aspect, calibration is performed in a quantum computing system. In some cases, domains of a quantum computing system are identified, where the domains include respective domain control subsystems and respective subsets of quantum circuit devices in a quantum processor of the quantum computing system. Sets of measurements are obtained from one of the domains and stored in memory. Device characteristics of the quantum circuit devices of the domain are obtained based on the set of measurements, and the device characteristics are stored in a memory of the control system. Quantum logic control parameters for the subset of quantum circuit devices of the domain are obtained based on the set of measurements and stored in memory.