Gate-Defined Quantum Dot Graph Extraction With Structural Learning

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing image processing systems for pattern recognition and graph extraction from gate-defined semiconductor quantum dots are inefficient due to the lack of structural relationships between key points, requiring significant redesigns in data processing and training methods.

Innovation Solution

A system that uses one or more processors to obtain data from quantum dot devices, generate images with pixel-level coordinates, process these images with a deep network to predict graphs, compare predicted graphs to ground truth annotations to generate a loss, and optimize the deep network based on this loss.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If existing key point detection systems are used without structural relationships, then the system is simpler to implement, but pattern recognition performance deteriorates, especially in the low-data regime

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvepattern recognition performanceVSAvoidsystem complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent segments the pattern recognition task into two distinct components: (1) key point detection that identifies individual points, and (2) relationship detection that identifies structural connections between key points. This segmentation allows each component to be optimized independently while maintaining overall system manageability, resolving the contradiction between performance and complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The patent adds a new dimension to traditional key point detection by incorporating relationship predictions between key points. Instead of only predicting point locations (2D coordinates), the system now predicts both locations and inter-point relationships, effectively moving from a 2D problem to a higher-dimensional space that includes structural information.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #17Another dimension (Dimensionality change)

2Reliability

If structural relationships between key points are incorporated, then pattern recognition performance improves, but data processing and training methods require major redesign

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvepattern recognition performanceVSAvoidease of implementation
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSEase of manufacture

Solution Approach 1:

The patent creates a multi-functional loss function that simultaneously optimizes for key point detection accuracy and structural relationship accuracy. This universal loss function handles both detection tasks in a single optimization framework, eliminating the need for separate processing pipelines and maintaining ease of implementation through unified training.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Solution Approach 2:

The system uses the predicted relationships between key points to automatically generate training signals for optimizing the detection algorithm. The model self-corrects by using its own relationship predictions to guide the optimization process, reducing the need for external annotation efforts and simplifying the training procedure.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

3Measurement precision

If annotations between key points are added to indicate edges, then structural relationship recognition improves, but labeling complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvestructural relationship accuracyVSAvoidlabeling complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system generates its own training labels by using the predicted relationships between detected key points. Instead of requiring external annotators to manually label all relationships, the model uses its own predictions to create supervision signals, automatically bootstrapping the training process and eliminating complex manual labeling requirements.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

4Productivity

If a loss function utilizing structural relationships is included, then training effectiveness improves, but system complexity and development difficulty increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvetraining effectivenessVSAvoidloss function complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent designs a universal loss function that combines multiple objectives (key point detection loss and relationship detection loss) into a single unified formulation. This multi-functional loss handles both detection tasks simultaneously with a coherent mathematical framework, avoiding the need for complex multi-stage training procedures and maintaining implementation simplicity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Data Source

PatentUS12347180B1System and method for pattern recognition and graph extraction for data collected from gate-defined semiconductor quantum dots
Publication Date: 2025.07.01 HRL LAB
  • US12347180B1 patent drawing
  • US12347180B1 patent drawing
  • US12347180B1 patent drawing

AI summary

Described is a system for pattern recognition and graph extraction. The system operates by obtaining data from a quantum dot device having gate defined semiconductor quantum dots. An image with pixel-level coordinates is then generated from the data. Ground truth graph annotations are received of the image. A deep network processes the image and pixel-level coordinates to generate a predicted graph. The predicted graph is compared to the graph annotations to generate a loss, which allows the deep network to be optimized by updating parameters in the deep network based on the loss. The image with pixel-level coordinates is then used to generate an optimized predicted graph, which allows for identifying operational voltages to apply to the quantum dot device.