Superconducting Quantum Gate Control Signal Segmentation for Fidelity

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing quantum computing systems face challenges in optimizing control signals for quantum logic gates in superconducting quantum circuits, which affects the fidelity and overall performance of quantum computing operations.

Innovation Solution

An automated process is implemented to update specific parameters of control signals, such as voltage amplitudes for time segments, to improve the quality measure of quantum logic gates by iteratively calculating new amplitudes for selected time segments while preserving initial amplitudes for others, using a classical computer system to analyze and optimize control signals for quantum processor cells.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If control signal parameters are manually tuned to improve quantum logic gate fidelity, then the quality measure of quantum operations improves, but the time and complexity of optimization increases significantly

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvefidelity of quantum logic gatesVSAvoidoptimization time
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs self-optimization by automatically analyzing control signal parameters and adjusting them to improve quantum logic gate fidelity without requiring manual intervention. The quantum computing system itself generates and evaluates candidate parameter sets, enabling autonomous optimization that reduces both time and human effort while maintaining high fidelity standards.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Solution Approach 2:

The optimization process implements feedback mechanisms where the results of quantum logic gate operations are measured and used to adjust control signal parameters iteratively. This closed-loop approach allows the system to learn from previous operations and continuously improve fidelity by adjusting voltage amplitudes and timing based on measured performance metrics.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

2Measurement precision

If comprehensive optimization of all control signal parameters is performed, then quantum operation accuracy improves, but computational complexity and resource requirements increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvequantum operation accuracyVSAvoidoptimization system complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The optimization process segments the control signal into discrete time segments and optimizes parameters for each segment independently rather than treating the entire signal as a single unit. This division allows the system to manage complexity by breaking down the optimization problem into smaller, more tractable sub-problems while still achieving comprehensive optimization of the overall quantum operation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The system optimizes a subset of critical parameters rather than exhaustively optimizing all possible parameters. By identifying and focusing on the most influential parameters that have the greatest impact on quantum logic gate fidelity, the system achieves high accuracy without the prohibitive computational cost of complete parameter optimization.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #16Partial or excessive action

3Reliability

If iterative optimization processes are used to improve control signal quality, then quantum logic gate fidelity improves, but the number of operations and time required increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvequantum logic gate fidelityVSAvoidoptimization throughput
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs preliminary optimization by pre-calculating and storing optimal control signal parameter sets for common quantum logic gate operations. When executing these standard operations, the system can directly apply pre-optimized parameters without performing full iterative optimization, significantly reducing the time and computational resources required while maintaining high fidelity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The optimization process focuses on changing only the critical parameters that have the most significant impact on quantum logic gate fidelity, such as voltage amplitudes and timing of control signals. By identifying and optimizing only these key parameters rather than all parameters equally, the system achieves substantial fidelity improvement with fewer optimization iterations and reduced computational overhead.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Data Source

PatentUS9979400B1Analyzing control signals for quantum logic operations in superconducting quantum circuits
Publication Date: 2018.05.22 RIGETTI & CO INC
  • US9979400B1 patent drawing
  • US9979400B1 patent drawing
  • US9979400B1 patent drawing

AI summary

In a general aspect, control of a quantum superconducting circuit is analyzed. In some implementation, a parameter set for a control signal for a superconducting quantum circuit is received. The parameters set can include initial voltage amplitudes for respective time segments of the control signal. A first subset of time segments is selected for improving a quality measure of a quantum logic operation produced by delivery of the control signal in the superconducting quantum circuit. New voltage amplitudes are calculated for one or more segments in the first subset, such that the new voltage amplitudes improve the quality measure. The parameter set is updated to include the new voltage amplitudes for the first subset while preserving the initial voltage amplitudes for a second subset of the time segments.