Quantum Gradient Circuit for Broader Function-Class Estimation

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing quantum gradient algorithms, such as those described by Jordan and Gilyén, only guarantee a complexity scaling advantage for a specific class of smooth functions (Gevrey class G1/2 functions), failing to provide advantages for many real-world functions that do not fit this category.

Innovation Solution

The implementation of Simulation-Free Quantum Gradient (SFQG) methods using quantum circuits with phase oracles, employing finite difference approximations of order greater than zero, allows for gradient estimation on a wider range of functions, achieving a complexity scaling of (√{square root over (k)}/ϵ or less.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Productivity

If the Jordan and Gilyén quantum gradient algorithm is used, then complexity scaling advantage is achieved for Gevrey class G1/2 functions, but the algorithm cannot guarantee advantage for functions outside this class

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecomputational efficiencyVSAvoidfunction class applicability
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSAdaptability or versatility

Solution Approach 1:

The patent changes the smoothness parameter requirement from Gevrey class G1/2 to a broader class of functions with smoothness parameter α ≥ 1/2. This parameter relaxation allows the quantum gradient algorithm to maintain its quadratic complexity scaling advantage while applying to a wider range of functions including those not in the Gevrey class, thereby resolving the contradiction between computational efficiency and function class applicability

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

2Measurement precision

If finite difference approximation of order m > 0 is used in the phase oracle, then gradient estimation accuracy is improved, but computational complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvegradient estimation accuracyVSAvoidquantum circuit complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent employs finite difference approximation of order m > 0 in the phase oracle construction, which provides gradient estimation accuracy within error ε while maintaining quantum circuit complexity scaling of Õ(√k/ε). This partial use of higher-order approximation achieves sufficient precision for practical applications without the full complexity overhead of maximum-order methods, balancing accuracy and computational resources

Inventive Principle:
Principle #16Partial or excessive action

Data Source

PatentUS12493812B2Quantum advantage using quantum circuit for gradient estimation
Publication Date: 2025.12.09 GOLDMAN SACHS & CO LLC
  • US12493812B2 patent drawing
  • US12493812B2 patent drawing
  • US12493812B2 patent drawing

AI summary

Described herein are quantum gradient algorithms that result in a quantum advantage over conventional methods. In an example, a quantum circuit is configured to implement a quantum gradient algorithm when executed on qubits of a quantum computing system. The quantum gradient algorithm includes a phase oracle OSfm defined by a finite difference approximation with an order greater than zero, and a complexity of the quantum gradient algorithm scales as (√{square root over (k)}/ϵ). The quantum circuit is repeatedly executed on qubits of a quantum computing system to determine a k-dimensional gradient of a function ƒ(x) within an error ϵ at point x0.