Quantum Hamiltonian Embedding for Larger Molecular Simulations

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current quantum computers face limitations in simulating larger molecules due to hardware constraints such as the number of qubits, gate depth, and gate fidelity, leading to high computational costs and errors in molecular simulations.

Innovation Solution

The system modifies the qubit Hamiltonian using spin coherent states and quantum logic gates to reduce the number of quantum circuit gate operations, embedding it on a quantum computer to achieve improved computational accuracy and reduce the number of qubits required, thereby enhancing the efficiency of quantum simulations.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Measurement precision

If conventional numerical methods are used to solve molecular simulations, then computational accuracy can be maintained, but computational time becomes intractable due to many body interactions

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecomputational accuracyVSAvoidcomputational time
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The patent replaces conventional classical numerical methods with quantum mechanical approaches using a quantum computer. The quantum computer utilizes quantum bits (qubits) and quantum operations to simulate molecular systems, fundamentally changing the computational paradigm from classical to quantum mechanics to achieve efficient simulation of many-body quantum systems

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

2Adaptability or versatility

If the number of qubits is increased to simulate larger molecules, then simulation capability improves, but hardware limitations and computational cost increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesimulation capabilityVSAvoidnumber of qubits
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies segmentation by dividing the molecular simulation problem into smaller manageable components through qubit grouping and block encoding techniques. The Hamiltonian is partitioned into blocks that can be processed separately, allowing simulation of larger molecules without requiring a proportional increase in total qubit count

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The patent implements nesting through block encoding where multiple logical qubits are encoded within a smaller number of physical qubits. The Hamiltonian blocks are nested within a larger computational framework, allowing efficient representation of large molecular systems with limited hardware resources

Inventive Principle:
Principle #7Nested doll (Nesting)

3Measurement precision

If gate depth is increased to achieve full configuration interaction equivalent energy, then computational accuracy improves, but noise introduction increases and gate fidelity decreases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveenergy calculation accuracyVSAvoidgate fidelity
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies partial action by implementing a truncated configuration interaction approach where only the most significant Hamiltonian blocks are included in the simulation. This partial inclusion of interaction terms achieves sufficient accuracy for practical applications while keeping the circuit depth and noise accumulation within acceptable limits

Inventive Principle:
Principle #16Partial or excessive action

Solution Approach 2:

The patent changes parameters by introducing variational parameters that optimize the balance between circuit depth and accuracy. Through variational quantum eigensolver techniques, the system adjusts parameters to achieve the desired energy accuracy with minimal gate operations, thereby reducing noise impact

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

4Reliability

If the number of quantum circuit gate operations is reduced to minimize noise, then gate fidelity improves, but computational accuracy may deteriorate

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvegate fidelityVSAvoidcomputational accuracy
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSMeasurement precision

Solution Approach 1:

The patent utilizes parameter changes through variational optimization where circuit parameters are adjusted to maximize accuracy for a given circuit depth. The variational parameters allow the system to find optimal solutions that achieve the best possible accuracy within the constraints of available gate operations and hardware fidelity

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Solution Approach 2:

The patent introduces an intermediary classical optimization process that bridges the quantum circuit execution and final result interpretation. The classical computer optimizes parameters based on measurement data, allowing the quantum circuit to operate at reduced depth while still achieving high accuracy through iterative parameter refinement

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

Data Source

PatentUS20240054374A1Methods and systems for solving a problem on a quantum computer
Publication Date: 2024.02.15 OTI LUMIONICS INC
  • US20240054374A1 patent drawing
  • US20240054374A1 patent drawing
  • US20240054374A1 patent drawing

AI summary

A method of solving a problem can include providing a fermionic Hamiltonian, transformation of the fermionic Hamiltonian to qubit operators, transformation of the fermionic Hamiltonian in qubit operators to a mean-field Hamiltonian, and embedding the Hamiltonian onto a quantum computer. Such systems and methods may improve upon existing methods for solving electronic structure problems on a computer by adapting the problem to available hardware, reducing computational cost, and reducing the number of required qubits to solve electronic structure problems for larger number of atoms.