Quantum Processor for Image Recognition via QUBO Mapping

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current image recognition techniques, such as Elastic Bunch Graph Matching, face limitations in accuracy and speed due to the computational effort required for generating and comparing detailed graph representations of facial images, which can be resource-intensive and time-consuming.

Innovation Solution

Implementing a quantum processor to solve image matching problems by mapping them into a quadratic unconstrained binary optimization (QUBO) problem, using adiabatic quantum algorithms to determine characteristics like the Maximum Independent Set or Maximum Clique of association graphs, thereby enhancing accuracy and reducing computation time.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Measurement precision

If traditional graph matching methods are used for image recognition, then detailed feature comparison is achieved, but computation time increases significantly

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveimage recognition accuracyVSAvoidcomputation time
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The patent replaces traditional mechanical/computational graph matching algorithms with a quantum annealing system. The classical computational approach is substituted with quantum mechanical evolution, where quantum tunneling and superposition enable parallel exploration of solution spaces, dramatically reducing computation time while maintaining recognition accuracy.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent transforms the image recognition problem into a different parameter space by mapping graph matching to a quadratic unconstrained binary optimization (QUBO) problem. This parameter transformation allows the system to leverage quantum annealing dynamics, changing the computational approach from sequential classical algorithms to parallel quantum evolution.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

2Measurement precision

If detailed graph representations are generated and compared, then recognition accuracy improves, but computational resources are consumed excessively

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvefeature matching accuracyVSAvoidcomputational resource consumption
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSUse of energy by moving object

Solution Approach 1:

The patent substitutes energy-intensive classical computational processes with quantum annealing, which utilizes quantum tunneling effects to navigate the energy landscape of the optimization problem. This replacement reduces the computational resources required while maintaining the ability to process detailed graph representations for accurate feature matching.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

3Productivity

If quantum processing is implemented for image matching, then computation speed increases, but system complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveimage processing speedVSAvoidquantum system complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent introduces a classical-quantum hybrid architecture where a classical system prepares the problem (graph generation, QUBO formulation) and interfaces with a quantum annealer for optimization. This intermediary classical layer manages the complexity of the quantum system, allowing high-speed processing while abstracting away quantum system complexities from the user.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

4Measurement precision

If adiabatic quantum algorithms are used to solve QUBO problems, then solution accuracy improves, but processing time increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveoptimization solution accuracyVSAvoidadiabatic evolution time
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The patent employs dynamic control of the Hamiltonian evolution in the quantum annealing process. By optimizing the annealing schedule and controlling the rate of change of the system parameters, the system achieves accurate solutions while minimizing the required evolution time, balancing accuracy and speed through dynamic parameter adjustment.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Data Source

PatentUS8655828B2Systems, methods, and apparatus for solving problems
Publication Date: 2014.02.18 D WAVE SYSTEMS INC
  • US8655828B2 patent drawing
  • US8655828B2 patent drawing
  • US8655828B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A method of improving the accuracy and computation time of automatic image recognition by the implementation of association graphs and a quantum processor.A method of solving problems using a quantum processor by casting a problem as a quadratic unconstrained binary optimization (“QUBO”) problem, mapping the QUBO problem to the quantum processor, and evolving the quantum processor to produce a solution to the QUBO problem.