Quantum Machine Learning Classifier With Ising Ground-State Encoding

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current quantum computers face challenges in processing classical data due to limited capacity and exponential quantum state spaces, leading to model overfitting and difficulties in encoding data effectively.

Innovation Solution

A method involving non-unitary measurements on an auxiliary system to project the encoded model into the ground state, using quantum processing units or their emulations, and extracting information as observables for predictive modeling, with techniques like Ising Hamiltonian encoding and quantum circuit execution.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Ease of manufacture

If data is encoded using native control-Z operations and virtual Z rotations on quantum processing hardware, then the classical problem can be expressed on a quantum computer with hardware efficiency, but the exponential quantum state space causes model overfitting

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvehardware efficiencyVSAvoidmodel overfitting
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of manufactureVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The patent extracts only the necessary quantum features from the full quantum state space by performing measurements on a subset of qubits. This selective extraction prevents the model from fitting to the entire exponential state space, thereby avoiding overfitting while maintaining hardware-efficient encoding through control-Z operations and virtual Z rotations.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent applies partial measurement action by measuring only certain qubits rather than the entire quantum state. This partial action is sufficient to capture the essential classification information while avoiding the harmful effect of capturing noise from the full exponential state space, thus preventing overfitting.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #16Partial or excessive action

2Loss of information

If the full quantum state space is utilized for encoding classical data, then comprehensive information representation is achieved, but the limited processing capacity of current and near-term quantum computers becomes insufficient

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveinformation representationVSAvoidprocessing capacity
Core Design Contradiction:
Loss of informationVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent extracts the essential information needed for classification by measuring only a subset of qubits rather than the full quantum state. This extraction maintains sufficient information representation for the classification task while being compatible with the limited processing capacity of current quantum computers.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent uses partial measurement action on selected qubits, which provides sufficient information for effective classification without requiring the full processing capacity needed to handle the entire exponential quantum state space.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #16Partial or excessive action

3Reliability

If non-unitary measurements are performed on an auxiliary system to project the encoded model into the ground state, then model overfitting is prevented and classification accuracy is improved, but additional measurement operations increase system complexity

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveclassification accuracyVSAvoidsystem complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent uses an auxiliary system of qubits as an intermediary to perform the classification measurement. The auxiliary qubits interact with the encoded data qubits through controlled operations, enabling the projection into the ground state and extraction of classification information without requiring direct complex measurements on the full system.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent segments the quantum system into data qubits for encoding and auxiliary qubits for measurement. This segmentation allows the classification function to be separated from the data storage function, simplifying the measurement process while maintaining classification accuracy and preventing overfitting.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Data Source

PatentUS20250328793A1Machine Learning System Using Quantum Computing
Publication Date: 2025.10.23 HSBC TECHNOLOGY & SERVICES USA INC
  • US20250328793A1 patent drawing
  • US20250328793A1 patent drawing
  • US20250328793A1 patent drawing

AI summary

Methods and systems for training and using a binary classifier implemented using quantum computing techniques are disclosed. The described approach involves deriving, from an input data set, a plurality of training samples, each training sample comprising a data vector having a plurality of features and a class label. Each data vector is processed using a quantum classification process including: encoding the data vector as an Ising Hamiltonian; implementing the Ising Hamiltonian on a set of real or virtual qubits of a quantum processing unit or an emulation thereof to form a quantum system representing the data vector; executing operations on the (emulation of the) quantum processing unit to prepare the ground state of the quantum system; determining one or more properties of the ground state; and identifying one of a set of possible ground states corresponding to the data vector based on the one or more properties. The system then determines, based on the identified ground states and class labels for the training samples, a mapping that maps ground states to class labels. The mapping is stored and used for classifying further data samples.