Quantum LDPC Decoding With Channel Reconfiguration Feedback

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

The existing quantum low-density parity-check code decoding algorithms, such as the belief propagation algorithm, face inefficiencies in iterative decoding due to the failure to exploit degeneracy and the excessive number of decoding iterations required when error correction fails.

Innovation Solution

The proposed solution involves reconfiguring quantum channel information based on the relationship between unsatisfied check nodes and variable nodes during iterative decoding, and determining the priority of variable nodes for reconfiguration to enhance decoding efficiency.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If the belief propagation algorithm is used for quantum low-density parity-check code decoding, then the decoding process can be performed, but degeneracy cannot be exploited leading to reduced decoding efficiency

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedecoding efficiencyVSAvoiddegeneracy exploitation capability
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSAdaptability or versatility

Solution Approach 1:

The patent implements a feedback mechanism where the decoder receives syndrome information, performs belief propagation decoding, checks for successful decoding, and if unsuccessful, feeds back to reconfigure quantum channel information and repeat the process. This iterative feedback loop enables the system to adapt and eventually exploit degeneracy to improve decoding efficiency.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Solution Approach 2:

The patent changes quantum channel information parameters when decoding fails. Specifically, it reconfigures the quantum channel information associated with variable nodes connected to unsatisfied check nodes, modifying the parameters used in the belief propagation algorithm to enable degeneracy exploitation in subsequent iterations.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

2Reliability

If iterative decoding is performed when error correction fails, then error correction may eventually succeed, but the excessive number of decoding iterations reduces efficiency

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveerror correction success rateVSAvoiddecoding iteration time
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

Instead of performing numerous iterations with unchanged parameters, the patent reconfigures quantum channel information parameters when decoding fails. This parameter change strategy reduces the number of iterations needed by providing updated information that guides the decoder more effectively toward successful error correction.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Solution Approach 2:

The patent implements a feedback mechanism that monitors decoding success and triggers parameter reconfiguration when failure occurs. This feedback-controlled iteration process prevents excessive unnecessary iterations by adapting the quantum channel information based on decoding outcomes, thereby reducing time loss while maintaining high error correction success rates.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

3Measurement precision

If quantum channel information is reconfigured for all variable nodes, then decoding accuracy may improve, but the complexity of the decoding process increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedecoding accuracyVSAvoiddecoding process complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies local quality by reconfiguring quantum channel information only for variable nodes connected to unsatisfied check nodes, rather than all variable nodes. This localized approach maintains decoding accuracy for critical areas while reducing overall process complexity by avoiding unnecessary reconfiguration elsewhere.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Solution Approach 2:

The patent segments the variable nodes into different groups based on their connection to satisfied or unsatisfied check nodes. By identifying and separately handling only the relevant segment (variable nodes connected to unsatisfied check nodes), the system improves decoding accuracy where needed while minimizing the complexity increase.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Data Source

PatentUS12346774B2Apparatus and method for decoding quantum low-density parity-check code
Publication Date: 2025.07.01 KOREA ADVANCED INST OF SCI & TECH
  • US12346774B2 patent drawing
  • US12346774B2 patent drawing
  • US12346774B2 patent drawing

AI summary

An apparatus and method for decoding a quantum low density parity-check code using quantum channel information whereby the apparatus and method provide a technique of performing iterative decoding initially using a first error correction and when error correction fails using a second error correction, in a process decoding a quantum low-density parity-check code based on a belief propagation algorithm.