Quantum Model Training via Dynamic Circuit Depth

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing quantum computers, classified as noisy intermediate-scale quantum (NISQ) devices, face challenges in training parameters of computationally demanding quantum computing system models due to noise, error-prone qubits, and issues like vanishing gradients and local minima/maxima traps.

Innovation Solution

A method involving selecting multiple data subsets from a set of data, training multiple parameters of a quantum computing system model using these subsets and adjusting the quantum circuit depth, and retraining on a quantum computer to improve training efficiency and accuracy.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Manufacturing precision

If quantum circuit depth is increased to improve model training accuracy, then training precision improves, but noise and errors increase due to NISQ device limitations

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemodel training accuracyVSAvoidcomputation reliability
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The training process is segmented into multiple iterations with progressively deeper quantum circuits. Each iteration trains on a subset of data with a specific circuit depth, and the process repeats with increased depth. This segmentation allows the system to gradually improve accuracy while managing noise accumulation at each stage.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The method performs preliminary training with shallow quantum circuits before progressing to deeper circuits. This preliminary action establishes a baseline model that can be progressively refined, allowing the system to benefit from deeper circuits only after the foundation is solid, thereby reducing the impact of noise in early training stages.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

2Manufacturing precision

If quantum circuit depth is increased to overcome vanishing gradients, then training effectiveness improves, but computational time increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvetraining effectivenessVSAvoidcomputational time
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The training process uses periodic action by alternating between classical optimization steps and quantum circuit evaluation. The quantum circuits are executed periodically at specific intervals during the training process, allowing the system to benefit from quantum computation only when necessary, thereby reducing total computational time while still overcoming vanishing gradients.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #19Periodic action

Solution Approach 2:

The quantum circuit depth is made dynamic rather than static, adjusting the circuit depth based on the training iteration number and performance requirements. This dynamic adjustment allows the system to use deeper circuits only when needed to overcome vanishing gradients, rather than consistently using maximum depth, thereby reducing overall computational time.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

3Reliability

If multiple data subsets are used for training iterations, then model robustness improves, but training complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemodel robustnessVSAvoidtraining complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The training data is segmented into multiple subsets that are processed in different iterations. Each subset is used to train the quantum model with specific circuit depth configurations. This segmentation approach improves model robustness by exposing it to diverse data patterns while managing training complexity through structured organization of the training process.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The training process incorporates feedback mechanisms where the performance on each data subset is evaluated and used to adjust subsequent training iterations. This feedback loop allows the system to improve robustness by identifying and addressing weaknesses in specific data subsets while maintaining manageable complexity through systematic performance monitoring and adjustment.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Data Source

PatentUS20250139476A1Quantum computing system model training
Publication Date: 2025.05.01 FUJITSU LTD
  • US20250139476A1 patent drawing
  • US20250139476A1 patent drawing
  • US20250139476A1 patent drawing

AI summary

A method may include selecting multiple data subsets from a data set and training multiple parameters of a quantum computing system model using the multiple data subsets and a quantum circuit depth using a quantum computer over multiple iterations. The method may include generating a solution for the plurality of data subsets using the quantum computing system model and the quantum computer. The method may also include comparing the solution to a threshold solution. The method may include adjusting the quantum circuit depth in response to the solution of the quantum computing system model not satisfying the threshold solution. The method may additionally include retraining, using the quantum computer, the multiple parameters of the quantum computing system model using the multiple data subsets and adjusted quantum circuit depth.