Quantum Processor Random Number Generation via Entangled Qubits

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current random number generation methods, especially in quantum processors, face challenges in producing verifiably random numbers that are difficult to simulate classically but can be certified, as uncoupled quantum processors generate unentangled numbers impossible to simulate, while known systems can be classically simulated, lacking security in cryptographic applications.

Innovation Solution

A method involving a quantum processor with a highly entangled nontrivial ground state, where random distortions are introduced to the Hamiltonian, allowing the quantum processor to generate random numbers that are difficult to simulate yet can be certified through classical simulation, using a quantum spin liquid with complex correlations and pseudo-random inputs to create a distinct, simulatable distribution.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Productivity

If a quantum processor generates random numbers using uncoupled qubits, then the generation speed is improved, but the numbers become unentangled and impossible to simulate for certification

Engineering Contradiction:
Improverandom number generation speedVSAvoidcertifiability of random numbers
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The patent merges multiple qubits into a coupled quantum system where qubits interact through controlled interactions. This coupling creates entangled states that can be simulated classically while maintaining the speed advantage of quantum processing. The merged system allows both rapid generation and subsequent certification through classical simulation of the entangled quantum states.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

2Ease of manufacture

If a known quantum system is used for random number generation, then the system is simple to implement, but the complex correlations can be classically simulated, compromising security

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesystem implementation simplicityVSAvoidcryptographic security
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of manufactureVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The patent introduces asymmetric coupling strengths and interaction parameters into the quantum system. By making the coupling characteristics non-uniform and system-specific, the quantum correlations become difficult to replicate classically. This asymmetry maintains the simplicity of the quantum hardware while preventing efficient classical simulation of the correlation structure, thus ensuring cryptographic security.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #4Asymmetry

3Reliability

If random distortions are introduced to the Hamiltonian, then the distribution becomes distinct and secure, but the system complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesecurity of random numbersVSAvoidHamiltonian modification complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent implements dynamic control of coupling parameters where distortion strengths can be adjusted during operation. The Hamiltonian modifications are applied through time-dependent control fields that can be tuned to create the required complexity for security while maintaining manageable system architecture. This dynamic approach allows the system to adapt complexity levels based on security requirements.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

This approach generates truly random numbers that are secure for cryptographic use, balancing difficulty in classical simulation with the ability to verify authenticity, ensuring the randomness and security of generated numbers.

Implementation Method 1

A method involves a quantum processor with a highly entangled nontrivial ground state, where random distortions are introduced to the Hamiltonian

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectQuantum entanglement:

Implementation Method 2

the highly entangled nontrivial ground state comprising a uniform superposition of classical ground states

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectSuperposition:

Implementation Method 3

introducing one or more distortions to the Hamiltonian by one or more random variations, the one or more random variations selected based on an input value to provide a modified Hamiltonian

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectQuantum Hamiltonian modification:

Data Source

PatentUS20240168720A1Systems and methods for random number generation
Publication Date: 2024.05.23 D WAVE SYSTEMS INC
  • US20240168720A1 patent drawing
  • US20240168720A1 patent drawing
  • US20240168720A1 patent drawing

AI summary

Systems and methods for random number generation are discussed. A first processor is in communication with a quantum processor, the quantum processor having an array of superconducting qubits. The first processor instructs the quantum processor to selectively communicatively couple the superconducting qubits to embed a quantum system having a highly entangled nontrivial ground state. The highly entangled nontrivial ground state comprising a uniform distribution of classical ground states. One or more distortions are introduced to the uniform distribution by one or more random variations based on an input value. The quantum processor evolves over the embedded quantum system. A set of one or more random numbers is received from the quantum processor.