Quantum Processor Unit-Cell Layout for Scalable Low-Interference Qubits

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Designing scalable quantum processors is hindered by challenges in controlling, programming, and maintaining quantum hardware, including layout constraints and interference between components.

Innovation Solution

A quantum processor design utilizing a unit cell-based approach with qubits arranged in rows, where control and readout components are positioned to minimize overlap and interference, allowing for scalable expansion by tiling unit cells without new components intersecting existing ones, and using a two-chip configuration with dielectric and shielding layers to reduce interference.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Device complexity

If qubits are arranged in a grid layout with control and readout components on the same chip, then the device structure is simple, but component overlap and interference increase as the system scales

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedevice structureVSAvoidcomponent interference
Core Design Contradiction:
Device complexityVSObject-affected harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The quantum processor is divided into multiple unit cells, each containing a specific number of qubits (e.g., 4 qubits per unit cell). This segmentation allows the system to scale by tiling unit cells while maintaining manageable complexity and minimizing interference within each cell. The control and readout components are contained within or near their respective unit cells, preventing cross-cell interference.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The patent transitions from a two-dimensional planar layout to a three-dimensional stacked architecture. Qubits are arranged on a first chip while control and readout components are positioned on a second chip bonded to the first chip. This vertical separation in the third dimension eliminates component overlap and interference while maintaining simple routing connections between corresponding qubits and their control/readout elements.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #17Another dimension (Dimensionality change)

2Power

If control and readout components are placed close to qubits for efficient coupling, then coupling efficiency improves, but layout constraints and component overlap increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecoupling efficiencyVSAvoidlayout constraints
Core Design Contradiction:
PowerVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

Control and readout components are positioned on a second chip that is bonded to the first chip containing qubits. This vertical arrangement in the third dimension allows strong electromagnetic coupling between qubits and their control/readout elements while eliminating planar layout constraints and component overlap. The short vertical distance maintains coupling efficiency while the stacked architecture simplifies routing.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #17Another dimension (Dimensionality change)

Solution Approach 2:

The system is segmented into unit cells where each unit cell's control and readout components are dedicated to specific qubits within that unit cell. This segmentation organizes the layout systematically, reducing overall device complexity while maintaining efficient local coupling between qubits and their control elements.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

3Productivity

If the quantum processor is scaled up by adding more qubits and components, then processing power increases, but component interference and layout constraints worsen

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveprocessing powerVSAvoidcomponent interference
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSObject-affected harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The quantum processor is divided into multiple unit cells, each containing a fixed number of qubits (e.g., 4 qubits) and their associated control and readout components. This segmentation allows the system to scale processing power by tiling unit cells while containing interference within each cell. The modular structure ensures that adding more unit cells increases processing power without proportionally increasing component interference.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

By stacking multiple chip layers vertically, the system can scale to accommodate more qubits and components without increasing planar density. This three-dimensional arrangement distributes components across multiple layers, reducing interference while maintaining efficient coupling. The vertical stacking enables scaling of processing power without the component overlap problems that plague two-dimensional layouts.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #17Another dimension (Dimensionality change)

4Object-affected harmful factors

If a two-chip configuration is used to separate qubits from control and readout components, then component interference is reduced, but device complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecomponent interferenceVSAvoiddevice structure
Core Design Contradiction:
Object-affected harmful factorsVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The two-chip configuration segments the quantum processor into a first chip containing qubits and a second chip containing control and readout components. This segmentation reduces component interference by physically separating different functional elements. The device complexity is managed by organizing components into standardized unit cells that can be systematically tiled and bonded, making the multi-chip structure more manageable.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The separation of qubits and control/readout components onto different chips creates a vertical three-dimensional architecture. This approach reduces component interference by eliminating planar overlap while the short vertical distance between chips maintains efficient coupling. The stacked configuration manages device complexity by providing clear functional separation and systematic routing paths between chips.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #17Another dimension (Dimensionality change)

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

Facilitates scalable quantum processor design by enabling flexible scaling, reducing layout constraints, and minimizing interference, thus enhancing performance and coherence.

Implementation Method 1

a first qubit readout transmission line is arranged to electromagnetically couple to each qubit readout resonator positioned within a footprint of a corresponding control region of the first qubit row

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectElectromagnetic coupling: Electromagnetic Induction

Implementation Method 2

using a two-chip configuration with dielectric and shielding layers to reduce interference

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectElectromagnetic shielding: Faraday Cage

Implementation Method 3

The two or more qubits of the first qubit row are offset relative to the two or more qubits of the second qubit row such that qubit columns of the first qubit row are misaligned with respect to qubit columns of the second qubit row

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectGeometric arrangement for interference reduction:

Data Source

PatentUS20250280738A1Scalable quantum processor design
Publication Date: 2025.09.04 GOOGLE LLC
  • US20250280738A1 patent drawing
  • US20250280738A1 patent drawing
  • US20250280738A1 patent drawing

AI summary

A device includes: a first chip including a plurality of qubits arranged in an array on a first side of the first chip, in which the array includes a plurality of qubit rows and a plurality of qubit columns, in which the plurality of qubits includes a first qubit row including two or more qubits and a second qubit row including two or more qubits, and in which the second qubit row is directly adjacent to the first qubit row; a second chip bonded to the first chip, in which the second chip has a first side that faces the first side of the first chip; a plurality of qubit control elements; a plurality of qubit readout resonators; and a plurality of qubit readout transmission lines.