Quantum State Purity Measurement Using Porter-Thomas Variance

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing quantum state tomography methods scale exponentially with the number of qubits, making them intractable for large-scale quantum computing systems, and there is a need to distinguish between systematic and noise-induced errors in quantum circuits.

Innovation Solution

A method to measure quantum state purity using raw measurement data from quantum hardware benchmarking experiments, employing Porter-Thomas statistics to determine purity without full state tomography, allowing for efficient identification of systematic control errors.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Measurement precision

If quantum state tomography is used to measure quantum state purity, then measurement precision is improved, but device complexity and resource requirements scale exponentially with the number of qubits

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvequantum state purity measurementVSAvoidexperiment complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent extracts only the necessary statistical information (variance of measurement outcomes) needed to determine purity, rather than performing complete state tomography. By using the relationship between variance and purity for random quantum circuits, the method extracts the purity metric directly from measurement statistics without reconstructing the full quantum state, thereby reducing experimental complexity while maintaining measurement precision.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent changes the measurement parameter from full state reconstruction to variance calculation. By measuring the variance of outcome probabilities and using the Porter-Thomas distribution characteristics, the method transforms the measurement task into a simpler statistical analysis that scales polynomially rather than exponentially with system size.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

2Loss of information

If full quantum state tomography is performed, then complete quantum state information is obtained, but measurement time and resource requirements become intractable for large-scale systems

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvequantum state informationVSAvoidmeasurement time
Core Design Contradiction:
Loss of informationVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The patent extracts only the purity-related statistical moments (variance) from measurement data rather than reconstructing the complete quantum state. This selective extraction of information maintains the ability to characterize quantum state quality while dramatically reducing the number of measurements and computational resources required, making the process feasible for large-scale quantum systems.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent performs partial tomography by measuring only the statistics necessary to determine purity (variance of outcome distributions) rather than complete state reconstruction. This partial measurement approach provides sufficient information for purity assessment without the exponential overhead of full tomography, enabling scalable purity measurement.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #16Partial or excessive action

3Adaptability or versatility

If random quantum circuits with varying depths are used, then comprehensive benchmarking is achieved, but distinguishing systematic errors from noise becomes difficult

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvebenchmarking capabilityVSAvoiderror characterization accuracy
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSMeasurement precision

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies different circuit depth configurations to different measurement sets, with each set optimized for specific error characterization goals. By varying circuit depth locally across different measurement campaigns rather than using a single fixed depth, the method can isolate systematic errors from noise while maintaining comprehensive benchmarking capability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Solution Approach 2:

The patent employs periodic variation of circuit depth in measurement sequences, alternating between different depth configurations to systematically probe error sources. This periodic modulation of circuit parameters enables the separation of systematic control errors from stochastic noise through statistical analysis of purity variations across different circuit depths.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #19Periodic action

Data Source

PatentUS20260024001A1Measuring quantum state purity
Publication Date: 2026.01.22 GOOGLE LLC
  • US20260024001A1 patent drawing
  • US20260024001A1 patent drawing
  • US20260024001A1 patent drawing

AI summary

Methods, systems and apparatus for measuring quantum state purity. In one aspect, a method for determining an average purity of multiple output quantum states, wherein the multiple output quantum states correspond to applications of respective random quantum circuits of a same circuit depth to a same initial quantum state, the method including: obtaining a plurality of data items, wherein each data item corresponds to a respective random quantum circuit of the same circuit depth and represents a probability that application of the respective random quantum circuit to the initial quantum state produces a respective measurement result; calculating a variance of a plurality of data items; determining a Porter-Thomas distribution having a dimension equal to a dimension of each output quantum state; and dividing the calculated variance by a variance of the Porter-Thomas distribution to determine the average purity.