Quantum Receiver Bayesian Error Correction for Faint Optical Signals

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Classical error correction methods are not effectively applied to quantum receivers, leading to high error rates and inefficiencies in optical communication systems, particularly when using faint states of light.

Innovation Solution

A quantum-enabled error correction system utilizing a receiver with a beam splitter, optical local oscillator, and single photon detector, which employs Bayesian probability estimation to update the local oscillator state based on photon detection and determine the likelihood of communication alphabet symbols being correct, enabling self-accuracy estimation and error correction.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If classical error correction methods are applied to quantum receivers, then the system structure remains simple, but the symbol error rate remains high and cannot achieve quantum measurement advantages

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesymbol error rateVSAvoiderror correction system complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent implements a feedback mechanism where the receiver continuously monitors photon detection outcomes and updates the local oscillator state accordingly. The system uses Bayesian probability to calculate the likelihood of different communication alphabet symbols and adjusts the LO state to maximize the probability of correct symbol identification, creating a closed-loop error correction system that adapts to quantum measurement outcomes

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Solution Approach 2:

The quantum receiver performs self-accuracy estimation by using its own measurement outcomes to determine the reliability of detected symbols. The system calculates a posteriori Bayesian probability values based on photon detection events and uses this information to self-correct errors without requiring external classical error correction processing, enabling the quantum system to serve its own error correction needs

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

2Reliability

If quantum measurement is used to achieve lower error rates, then the symbol error rate decreases significantly, but the system complexity increases due to quantum components and processing

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecommunication reliabilityVSAvoidquantum receiver complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent designs the quantum receiver to perform multiple functions using a unified architecture. The same quantum measurement apparatus that detects photons also provides the data for error correction decisions. The local oscillator serves both as a reference for quantum interference measurement and as an adjustable parameter for error correction, eliminating the need for separate classical error correction hardware and reducing overall system complexity

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent introduces Bayesian probability calculation as an intermediary process that bridges quantum measurement outcomes and error correction decisions. Rather than directly processing quantum states through complex quantum error correction protocols, the system uses classical probability theory to interpret photon detection events and determine the most likely transmitted symbols, simplifying the error correction mechanism while maintaining quantum measurement advantages

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

3Use of energy by moving object

If faint states of light are used for communication, then the energy consumption is reduced, but the error rate increases due to noise in quantum measurements

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveenergy consumptionVSAvoiderror rate
Core Design Contradiction:
Use of energy by moving objectVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The patent implements dynamic adjustment of the local oscillator state based on real-time photon detection outcomes. Rather than using a fixed LO state, the system continuously adapts the LO parameters (such as phase and amplitude) to match the actual quantum measurement results, maximizing the signal-to-noise ratio for faint optical states and enabling reliable communication at lower energy levels

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The system changes the parameters of the local oscillator dynamically during the communication process. Based on the detected photon events and calculated Bayesian probabilities, the LO parameters are adjusted to optimize the interference pattern and enhance the detectability of faint optical signals, thereby maintaining low error rates even when using minimal optical energy

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

The system achieves a record-low symbol error rate of approximately 10^-9, significantly below classical limits, with reduced energy requirements and improved communication reliability using quantum measurement self-accuracy estimation.

Implementation Method 1

an optical local oscillator (LO) configured to produce destructive interference with the optical signal at the beam splitter

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectDestructive interference: Interference

Data Source

PatentUS12387129B2Systems and methods for quantum-enabled error correction
Publication Date: 2025.08.12 THE GOVERNMENT OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA AS REPRESENTED BY THE SECRETARY DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH & HUMAN SERVICES
  • US12387129B2 patent drawing
  • US12387129B2 patent drawing
  • US12387129B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A system for quantum-enabled error correction includes a receiver configured to receive an optical signal and detect photons. The optical signal includes encoded information that includes communication alphabet symbols. The receiver includes a processor and a memory that instructions stored thereon, which, when executed by the processor, cause the system to: detect photons by the receiver; determine a set of a posteriori Bayesian probability values based on a period of time of a previous state of the LO and based upon the detected photons; update the LO from the previous state to the next state based on the highest a posteriori Bayesian probability; and determine a likelihood of each of the communication alphabet symbols being correct based on the set of probability values. The next state of the LO is a new input state having a highest probability value that the next state matches the state of the optical signal.