Quantum Scalability Modeling for Large-Scale Performance Prediction

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Evaluating the scalability of quantum computing systems is challenging due to increasing sources of degradation and control complexity as systems scale, making it infeasible to extrapolate performance from smaller to larger systems, and costly to construct large-scale systems for measurement.

Innovation Solution

Develop systems and methods to evaluate scalability using benchmark performance data from smaller-scale quantum systems, applying scalability models to predict performance at larger scales, including hardware architectures and control strategies, and simulate or construct smaller-scale systems to extrapolate performance.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Measurement precision

If large-scale quantum systems are constructed for direct measurement, then measurement accuracy improves, but construction cost and resource requirements worsen

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveperformance measurement accuracyVSAvoidquantum resources required
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSQuantity of substance

Solution Approach 1:

The patent creates virtual copies of quantum systems through classical simulation. Instead of constructing physical large-scale quantum systems, the invention simulates their behavior using classical computers, thereby obtaining performance measurements without the exponential resource requirements of actual quantum hardware.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #26Copying

Solution Approach 2:

The patent introduces an intermediary classical simulation layer between the researcher and the quantum system. This intermediary allows indirect measurement of quantum system performance through classical computation, avoiding the need to directly construct and measure large-scale quantum systems.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

2Power

If quantum systems are scaled up to improve computational capability, then processing power improves, but control complexity worsens

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecomputational capabilityVSAvoidcontrol complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
PowerVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent creates virtual models of scaled-up quantum systems through classical simulation. These virtual copies allow researchers to study control strategies and system behavior at large scales without the exponential increase in actual control hardware and operational complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #26Copying

Solution Approach 2:

The patent performs preliminary classical simulations to optimize control strategies before implementing them on actual quantum hardware. This preliminary action allows control parameters to be tuned and validated in silico, reducing the complexity of actual system control.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

3Power

If quantum systems are scaled up to improve computational capability, then processing power improves, but degradation sources worsen

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecomputational capabilityVSAvoidsources of degradation
Core Design Contradiction:
PowerVSObject-affected harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The patent creates virtual representations of scaled quantum systems that incorporate models of degradation sources. These simulations allow researchers to study and mitigate the effects of degradation without the compounding problems that arise in actual large-scale quantum systems.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #26Copying

Data Source

PatentUS20260099742A1Systems and Methods for Evaluating Scalability of Quantum Computing Systems
Publication Date: 2026.04.09 GOOGLE LLC
  • US20260099742A1 patent drawing
  • US20260099742A1 patent drawing
  • US20260099742A1 patent drawing

AI summary

Systems and methods for evaluating the scalability of quantum systems are provided. In one example, a method may include obtaining benchmark performance data for a candidate quantum system architecture. The benchmark performance data may be descriptive of one or more performance characteristics of the candidate quantum system architecture for a plurality of processor sizes. The method may include obtaining one or more scaling parameters based on the benchmark performance data, including a quantum scaling model relating processor size of the candidate quantum system architecture to the one or more performance characteristics. The method may include determining one or more scaling metrics for the candidate quantum system architecture at a scaled processor size greater than the plurality of processor sizes by the quantum scaling model. The method may include determining one or more control actions for an operational quantum system based on the one or more scaling metrics.