Quantum Instruction Scheduling With Control Pulse Optimization

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing quantum computing systems face significant challenges in reducing computation latency due to inefficiencies in classical compilation techniques, which lead to a mismatch between logical and physical operations, especially as the number of qubits increases, resulting in exponential decay of output fidelity and potential decoherence.

Innovation Solution

A quantum compilation engine that optimizes quantum programs by breaking down logical instructions into smaller blocks, utilizing commutativity to maximize parallelism, and generating optimized control pulses, effectively mapping instructions onto qubits to reduce latency and align with physical hardware capabilities.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Adaptability or versatility

If quantum programs are compiled into quantum assembly instructions using conventional gate-based approaches, then a universal set of operations is achieved, but computation latency increases and output fidelity decays

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveuniversal set of operationsVSAvoidcomputation latency
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The patent segments the quantum program compilation process into multiple optimization stages: initial quantum assembly compilation, dependency graph generation, instruction aggregation into blocks, and parallel execution scheduling. This segmentation allows each stage to optimize specific aspects independently, reducing overall latency while maintaining universality through the modular architecture.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The patent performs preliminary actions by pre-computing dependency graphs and commutativity relationships between instructions before execution. By analyzing and caching these dependencies in advance, the system eliminates redundant runtime checks and enables faster parallel execution without sacrificing the ability to handle diverse quantum operations.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

2Ease of operation

If quantum assembly instructions are translated into control pulses for physical hardware, then operations can be executed on quantum processors, but latency increases due to the translation overhead and mismatch between logical and physical operations

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveexecution capabilityVSAvoidtranslation latency
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The patent introduces an intermediary optimization layer between quantum assembly and control pulse generation. This layer aggregates instructions into blocks, optimizes their execution order based on commutativity, and generates consolidated control pulses. This intermediary stage reduces the total number of pulse generation operations and eliminates redundant translations, significantly reducing latency while preserving execution accuracy.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

3Quantity of substance

If the number of qubits is increased to solve more complex problems, then computational capability improves, but output fidelity decays exponentially due to decoherence

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvenumber of qubitsVSAvoidoutput fidelity
Core Design Contradiction:
Quantity of substanceVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The patent implements continuous optimization throughout the compilation and execution pipeline. By continuously analyzing instruction dependencies, dynamically aggregating instructions into executable blocks, and optimizing control pulse generation in real-time, the system maximizes the utilization of available qubit coherence time. This continuous optimization ensures that computational tasks are completed as quickly as possible, maintaining high fidelity even as qubit counts increase.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #20Continuity of useful action

4Productivity

If quantum programs are optimized for parallel execution, then computation latency is reduced, but device complexity increases due to scheduling and aggregation overhead

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveexecution speedVSAvoidcompilation system complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent changes key parameters of the compilation system to balance parallelism and complexity. It introduces block size parameters, aggregation thresholds, and scheduling heuristics that can be tuned based on available quantum hardware resources. By parameterizing the optimization process, the system achieves high parallelism when resources permit while automatically reducing complexity for smaller or more constrained systems, maintaining adaptability across different quantum processors.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Data Source

PatentUS11416228B2System and method of optimizing instructions for quantum computers
Publication Date: 2022.08.16 UNIVERSITY OF CHICAGO
  • US11416228B2 patent drawing
  • US11416228B2 patent drawing
  • US11416228B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A quantum computing system includes a quantum processor having a plurality of qubits, a classical memory, and a classical processor. The classical processor is configured to compile a quantum program into logical assembly instructions in an intermediate language, aggregate the logical assembly instructions together into a plurality of logical blocks of instructions, generate a logical schedule for the quantum program based on commutativity between the plurality of logical blocks, generate a tentative physical schedule based on the logical schedule, the tentative physical schedule includes a mapping of the logical assembly instructions in the logical schedule onto the plurality of qubits of the quantum processor, aggregate instructions together within the tentative physical schedule that do not reduce parallelism, thereby generating an updated physical schedule; generate optimized control pulses for the aggregated instructions, and execute the quantum program on the quantum processor with the optimized control pulses and the updated physical schedule.