Automated Fuzz Testing for Quantum SDK Robustness

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current quantum Software Development Kits (SDKs) lack thorough testing, leading to potential crashes and vulnerabilities due to untested quantum programs, which can result in system failures and security loopholes.

Innovation Solution

An automated fuzzy-based end-to-end testing tool that receives and transforms QASM programs with mutating inputs to test the robustness and reliability of quantum SDKs, simulating crashes to identify and address potential issues.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Productivity

If quantum SDKs are released without thorough testing, then development speed is improved, but system reliability deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedevelopment speedVSAvoidsystem reliability
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The patent implements preliminary action by automatically generating test cases and executing fuzz testing before the quantum SDK is released. The testing tool transforms QASM programs into transformed QASM programs and executes them against the SDK to identify potential crashes and vulnerabilities in advance, ensuring reliability issues are caught before deployment.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The patent applies self-service by creating an automated testing system that independently generates test inputs, transforms quantum programs, executes tests against the SDK, and reports results without requiring manual intervention. The system uses genetic algorithms to automatically evolve test cases and identify edge cases that might cause crashes.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

2Reliability

If comprehensive testing is performed on quantum SDKs, then system reliability is improved, but testing complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesystem reliabilityVSAvoidtesting complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent uses copying by creating transformed copies of original QASM programs. The transformation process generates variant versions of quantum programs that preserve the original logic while introducing variations that can expose edge cases and vulnerabilities. These transformed programs serve as test inputs that comprehensively stress-test the SDK without requiring entirely new test case designs.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #26Copying

Solution Approach 2:

The patent applies parameter changes by systematically varying parameters in the transformed QASM programs, such as changing quantum gate parameters, qubit indices, and circuit depths. The genetic algorithm evolves these parameters to generate diverse test cases that cover different execution paths and potential failure modes in the quantum SDK.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Difficulty of detecting and measuring

If fuzz testing with mutated inputs is used, then bug detection capability is improved, but computational resources increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvebug detection capabilityVSAvoidcomputational resources
Core Design Contradiction:
Difficulty of detecting and measuringVSUse of energy by moving object

Solution Approach 1:

The patent implements partial or excessive action by generating a large number of transformed test cases that exceed minimal testing requirements. The system deliberately creates more test inputs than strictly necessary, using genetic algorithms to evolve populations of test cases that thoroughly explore the input space, accepting the computational cost as necessary for comprehensive bug detection.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #16Partial or excessive action

Solution Approach 2:

The patent uses feedback by monitoring the results of each fuzz testing iteration and using this information to guide subsequent test case generation. The genetic algorithm receives feedback from executed tests about which transformed programs caused crashes or errors, and uses this feedback to evolve better test cases that are more likely to expose vulnerabilities in subsequent iterations.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Data Source

PatentUS10698789B1Fuzz testing for quantum SDK
Publication Date: 2020.06.30 INTERNATIONAL BUSINESS MACHINE CORPORATION
  • US10698789B1 patent drawing
  • US10698789B1 patent drawing
  • US10698789B1 patent drawing

AI summary

The subject disclosure relates generally to an automated testing tool for quantum software development kits (SDKs). A system in accordance with an embodiment comprises a memory that stores computer-executable components. A processor is operably coupled to the memory and executes the computer-executable components stored in the memory. The computer-executed components comprises: a transformation component that receives a qasm program and transforms the qasm program; a testing component that tests the transformed qasm program on the SDK; and a reporting component that reports whether a quantum SDK has functioned properly or failed for the transformed qasm program.