Quantum Train and Driver Recovery Under Full Schedule Constraints

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Public rail transport companies face challenges in reassigning train driver tasks and updating schedules due to unplanned disruptions, with existing classical algorithms often requiring approximations and failing to consider complex constraints like driver breaks and train crossings, leading to suboptimal solutions.

Innovation Solution

Utilizing quantum computation, specifically through a QUBO formulation and quantum annealing, to solve the train and driver recovery problem by incorporating penalty terms that address constraints such as driver duties, timing, and train crossings, enabling exact solutions to complex transportation network disruptions.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If classical branch-and-bound algorithms are used to solve train and driver recovery problems, then the solution process is systematic and exhaustive, but the computational complexity increases significantly and approximations must be introduced to handle the large number of constraints

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesolution accuracyVSAvoidcomputational complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent replaces classical computational mechanics (branch-and-bound algorithms) with quantum computational mechanics (quantum annealing). This substitution allows the system to solve complex optimization problems with multiple constraints by utilizing quantum tunneling and superposition effects, achieving exact solutions without the exponential computational complexity that plagues classical approaches.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent transforms the train and driver recovery problem into a QUBO (Quadratic Unconstrained Binary Optimization) formulation, changing the problem parameters from a constrained optimization problem to an unconstrained one suitable for quantum annealing. This parameter transformation enables the quantum computer to handle the complex constraints (driver breaks, train crossings, legal working conditions) more efficiently by encoding them in the objective function rather than as explicit constraints.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

2Productivity

If approximations are introduced by excluding subsets of constraints to reduce complexity, then the computational task becomes manageable, but the solution quality deteriorates and may not satisfy all legal and regulatory conditions

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecomputational efficiencyVSAvoidconstraint satisfaction
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The patent performs preliminary action by formulating all constraints (driver breaks, train crossings, legal working conditions) into the QUBO objective function before quantum annealing begins. This allows the quantum computer to consider all constraints simultaneously from the start, eliminating the need to exclude any constraints and ensuring that the final solution satisfies all legal and regulatory conditions while maintaining computational efficiency.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

3Reliability

If the full set of constraints including driver breaks and train crossings is included in the optimization problem, then the solution satisfies all legal and regulatory conditions, but the problem complexity increases making it intractable for classical algorithms

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvelegal and regulatory complianceVSAvoidsolution speed
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent replaces classical optimization mechanics with quantum annealing mechanics to handle the full set of constraints. Quantum annealing can explore the solution space more efficiently by utilizing quantum tunneling to escape local minima and quantum superposition to evaluate multiple configurations simultaneously, achieving both full constraint satisfaction and high solution speed that is intractable for classical algorithms.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent transitions from classical computational dimension to quantum computational dimension by using quantum bits (qubits) that can exist in superposition states. This dimensional change allows the system to process and evaluate multiple constraint configurations simultaneously, solving the intractable optimization problem with full constraints at speeds unattainable by classical sequential processing.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #17Another dimension (Dimensionality change)

Data Source

PatentEP3985585B1Quantum computation for train and driver recovery problems
Publication Date: 2026.04.01 ACCENTURE GLOBAL SOLUTIONS LTD
  • EP3985585B1 patent drawingFigure 1
  • EP3985585B1 patent drawingFigure 2
  • EP3985585B1 patent drawingFigure 3

AI summary

Methods, systems, and apparatus for obtaining solutions to train and driver recovery problems using quantum computation. In one aspect, a method includes receiving data representing a train and driver recovery problem, wherein the train and driver recovery problem comprises a task of recovering from a disruption to a planned train and driver schedule; generating, based on the data representing the train and driver recovery problem, a quadratic unconstrained binary optimization (QUBO) formulation of the train and driver recovery problem, wherein the QUBO formulation excludes variables that relax constraints on driver duties; obtaining data representing a solution to the train and driver recovery problem from a quantum computing resource, wherein the data representing the solution to the train and driver recovery problem comprises an adjusted train and driver schedule; and initiating an action based on the obtained data representing a solution to the train and driver recovery problem.