Quantum Error Correction Qubit Allocation

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Quantum error correction in quantum computing is challenging due to the no-cloning theorem, entanglement properties, and decoherence, which complicates error correction without measurement and leads to exponential error propagation, necessitating efficient error reduction schemes that optimize qubit allocation and error correction operations.

Innovation Solution

A method is introduced to select the optimal allocation of physical qubits to logical qubits based on a utility per-qubit metric, using a search algorithm to find the best error correction scheme that minimizes error rates while considering the role and priority of each qubit, and implementing error correction operations using a greater number of physical qubits than logical qubits to reduce noise and enhance stability.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If more physical qubits are allocated to each logical qubit for error correction, then error rates of logical output qubits are reduced, but the quantity of physical resources increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveerror rate of logical output qubitsVSAvoidquantity of physical qubits
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSQuantity of substance

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies local quality by differentiating the allocation of physical qubits based on the importance and error sensitivity of different logical qubits. Critical logical qubits that directly affect output accuracy are allocated more physical qubits for error correction, while less critical intermediate qubits use fewer physical qubits. This non-uniform allocation optimizes the balance between overall error reduction and physical resource consumption.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Solution Approach 2:

The patent dynamically adjusts the number of physical qubits allocated to each logical qubit based on circuit depth, error rates, and computational importance. The allocation parameters are optimized to achieve the minimum error rate for logical output qubits while constraining the total physical qubit count, thereby resolving the contradiction between reliability and resource quantity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

2Stability of the object's composition

If quantum error correction operations are implemented, then stability of quantum states is improved, but device complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvestability of quantum statesVSAvoidcomplexity of error correction scheme
Core Design Contradiction:
Stability of the object's compositionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent segments the quantum circuit into logical qubits and implements error correction selectively on critical segments. Rather than applying uniform error correction to all qubits, the system identifies and protects only those logical qubits whose errors would significantly impact the final output, thereby reducing the overall complexity of the error correction scheme while maintaining quantum state stability for critical computations.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The patent introduces auxiliary physical qubits as intermediaries to implement error correction operations. These intermediary qubits enable syndrome measurements and error detection without directly measuring the logical qubit states, thereby maintaining quantum coherence while providing stability through indirect error correction mechanisms.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

3Ease of manufacture

If physical qubits are allocated to all logical qubits uniformly, then error protection is simplified, but resource utilization efficiency decreases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesimplicity of error correction allocationVSAvoidresource utilization efficiency
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of manufactureVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent replaces uniform allocation with local quality-based differentiation, where each logical qubit receives a customized number of physical qubits based on its computational importance and error sensitivity. This approach maintains reasonable implementation complexity while dramatically improving resource utilization efficiency by avoiding over-provisioning of non-critical qubits.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Data Source

PatentUS11416762B1Selecting physical qubits for quantum error correction schemes
Publication Date: 2022.08.16 CLASSIQ TECH LTD
  • US11416762B1 patent drawing
  • US11416762B1 patent drawing
  • US11416762B1 patent drawing

AI summary

A method, apparatus and product includes obtaining a logical representation of a quantum circuit and selecting a quantity of physical qubits for a physical representation of the quantum circuit, wherein the selecting of the quantity is based on a utility per-qubit metric that is used to define a utility per-qubit score of the quantum circuit. The utility per-qubit score is determined based on a ratio between a quality score of the quantum circuit when using the quantity of physical qubits and between a cost function of the quantum circuit, wherein the quality score is defined by a quality metric that is monotonically correlated to error rates of logical output qubits. The quantum circuit is synthesized using the quantity of the physical qubits that was selected.