Qubit Calibration Sequencing for Parameter Dependency Control

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Large-scale quantum computing faces challenges in efficiently and effectively calibrating multiple qubit parameters, which are unstable and require repeated calibration during quantum computations, increasing complexity and computational costs.

Innovation Solution

A method and system for automatically calibrating qubit parameters using a directed graph to model dependencies, performing calibration tests and experiments, and iteratively correcting parameters, flagging those within specification, and aborting processes when necessary to maintain qubit performance.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Productivity

If manual calibration methods are used for qubit parameters, then calibration can be performed, but the complexity and computational costs increase significantly due to the large number of parameters and their dependencies

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecalibration efficiencyVSAvoidcalibration system complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent segments the calibration process into distinct phases: identification phase (selecting which parameters to calibrate), calibration phase (performing calibration experiments), and verification phase (checking calibration results). This segmentation allows the system to handle large numbers of parameters systematically without overwhelming complexity, as each phase can be optimized independently.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The system performs preliminary actions by pre-identifying dependent parameter sets and calibration priorities before actual calibration begins. The identification phase determines which parameters need calibration and their dependencies in advance, allowing the calibration phase to proceed efficiently without ad-hoc decision-making during the actual calibration process.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

2Reliability

If repeated calibration is performed during quantum computations to maintain qubit stability, then qubit performance is maintained, but computational time and resources are consumed

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvequbit parameter stabilityVSAvoidcomputation time
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The patent implements feedback mechanisms where calibration results are continuously monitored and used to adjust subsequent calibration actions. The system checks calibration success and automatically triggers re-calibration only when parameters drift out of specification, rather than performing periodic calibration regardless of actual need. This feedback-driven approach maintains qubit stability while minimizing unnecessary calibration interruptions.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Solution Approach 2:

The system performs calibration at periodic intervals during quantum computations, but intelligently determines when calibration is actually needed based on parameter drift detection. Rather than continuous calibration, the system uses periodic checks to determine if calibration is necessary, balancing stability maintenance with computational efficiency.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #19Periodic action

3Measurement precision

If comprehensive calibration experiments are performed on all qubit parameters, then calibration accuracy is improved, but the number of required experiments and computational costs increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveparameter calibration accuracyVSAvoidcalibration throughput
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies local quality by performing comprehensive calibration only on specific parameters that are identified as needing calibration, rather than uniformly calibrating all parameters. The system determines which parameters have drifted or are critical for current computations and focuses calibration resources on those specific parameters, achieving high accuracy where needed while maintaining overall productivity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Solution Approach 2:

The system dynamically changes calibration parameters based on detected needs, adjusting which parameters are calibrated and with what precision. Rather than using fixed calibration protocols for all parameters, the system modifies calibration intensity and scope based on real-time parameter status, computational requirements, and drift detection, optimizing the balance between accuracy and throughput.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Data Source

PatentEP3469523B1Automatic qubit calibration
Publication Date: 2020.05.27 GOOGLE LLC
  • EP3469523B1 patent drawingFigure 1
  • EP3469523B1 patent drawingFigure 2
  • EP3469523B1 patent drawingFigure 3

AI summary

Methods and apparatus for automatic qubit calibration. In one aspect, a method includes obtaining a plurality of qubit parameters and data describing dependencies of the plurality of qubit parameters on one or more other qubit parameters; identifying a qubit parameter; selecting a set of qubit parameters that includes the identified qubit parameter and one or more dependent qubit parameters; processing one or more parameters in the set of qubit parameters in sequence according to the data describing dependencies, comprising, for a parameter in the set of qubit parameters: performing a calibration test on the parameter; and performing a first calibration experiment or a diagnostic calibration algorithm on the parameter when the calibration test fails.