Real-Time Qubit Calibration via Machine Learning Feedback

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current quantum computing systems face challenges in maintaining qubit calibration over time due to noise and environmental changes, requiring manual pre-calibration that becomes outdated during long algorithm runs, and existing machine-learning methods are not suitable for real-time adjustments.

Innovation Solution

Implementing a machine-learning engine that predicts and updates qubit control parameters in real-time using noisy sensor measurements and a simulated model to compensate for environmental-induced errors, allowing for continuous calibration during quantum algorithm execution.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Measurement precision

If manual pre-calibration is performed before quantum algorithm execution, then initial qubit control parameters are established, but calibration accuracy degrades over time due to noise and environmental changes

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvequbit control parameter accuracyVSAvoidcalibration validity duration
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSDuration of action of moving object

Solution Approach 1:

The patent implements a feedback mechanism where qubit measurement results during algorithm execution are fed back to a machine learning engine, which continuously updates control parameters. This closed-loop system maintains calibration accuracy by adapting to environmental changes in real-time, resolving the contradiction between initial calibration accuracy and its degradation over time.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Solution Approach 2:

The patent transitions from static pre-calibration to dynamic real-time calibration by using a machine learning engine that continuously adapts control parameters based on ongoing measurements. This dynamic approach allows the system to maintain optimal calibration throughout the quantum algorithm execution, addressing the time-dependent degradation issue.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

2Reliability

If real-time calibration during quantum algorithm execution is implemented, then calibration accuracy is maintained, but system complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvequantum operation stabilityVSAvoidcalibration system complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent employs a self-calibrating system where the quantum computer uses its own measurement results to automatically adjust its control parameters through a machine learning engine. This self-service approach maintains reliability without requiring external intervention or complex manual calibration procedures, balancing reliability improvement with acceptable system complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Solution Approach 2:

The patent introduces a machine learning engine as an intermediary between quantum measurements and control parameter adjustments. This intermediary processes measurement data and generates updated parameters, simplifying the overall system architecture while enabling continuous calibration and maintaining quantum operation stability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

3Productivity

If machine-learning methods are used for real-time calibration, then continuous parameter updates are enabled, but computational overhead increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecalibration update speedVSAvoidcomputational energy consumption
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSUse of energy by moving object

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies partial machine learning methods by using simplified models and selective updating of control parameters rather than complete re-calibration. This approach enables continuous parameter updates at lower computational cost, balancing calibration productivity with energy consumption constraints by performing only necessary adjustments.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #16Partial or excessive action

Data Source

PatentUS12016252B2System and method for automatic real-time calibration of qubit chips
Publication Date: 2024.06.18 INTEL CORP
  • US12016252B2 patent drawing
  • US12016252B2 patent drawing
  • US12016252B2 patent drawing

AI summary

Apparatus and methods for real time calibration of qubits in a quantum processor. For example, one embodiment of an apparatus comprises: a quantum processor comprising a plurality of qubits, each of the qubits having a state; a quantum controller to generate sequences of electromagnetic (EM) pulses to manipulate the states of the plurality of qubits based on a set of control parameters; a qubit measurement unit to measure one or more sensors associated with a corresponding one or more of the qubits of the plurality of qubits to produce one or more corresponding measured values; and a machine-learning engine to evaluate the one or more measured values in accordance with a machine-learning process to generate updated control parameters, wherein the quantum controller is to use the updated control parameters to generate subsequent sequences of EM pulses to manipulate the states of the plurality of qubits.