Quench Tower Segmentation for Catalyst Removal and Acid Neutralization

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Conventional quench towers for cooling hot reactor effluents from fluidized catalytic reactions face issues with catalyst removal, fouling, and inadequate neutralization of organic acids, leading to downstream equipment damage and inefficiencies.

Innovation Solution

A novel quench tower design employing co-current flow with a first quench liquid stream and vaporous reactor effluent through a bed, utilizing structured packing and multiple chambers for efficient catalyst removal and acid neutralization, reducing fouling and capital costs.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If conventional quench towers are used to cool hot reactor effluent, then cooling function is provided, but catalyst removal is inadequate and fouling occurs

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecatalyst removal efficiencyVSAvoidfouling
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSObject-generated harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The quench tower is divided into multiple chambers (first quench chamber, second quench chamber, neutralization chamber) with each chamber performing a specific function. The first quench chamber handles initial cooling and catalyst removal, the second chamber continues catalyst removal, and the neutralization chamber handles acid neutralization. This segmentation allows optimized conditions for each function, improving catalyst removal efficiency while reducing fouling in any single location.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

Different chambers are designed with specific local qualities: the quench chambers have structures optimized for catalyst removal (e.g., specific packing arrangements, flow patterns), while the neutralization chamber has structures optimized for acid neutralization. Each chamber's geometry, packing type, and flow characteristics are tailored to its specific function, maximizing performance for that particular task.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

2Reliability

If conventional quench towers are used, then cooling is achieved, but organic acid neutralization is inadequate

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveacid neutralizationVSAvoiddownstream equipment damage
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSObject-generated harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The system separates the neutralization function into a dedicated neutralization chamber distinct from the quench chambers. This dedicated chamber allows for optimized neutralization conditions (e.g., specific liquid-to-vapor ratios, contact time, pH control) that would not be achievable in a conventional single-purpose quench tower, thereby improving acid neutralization effectiveness and protecting downstream equipment.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

3Use of energy by moving object

If counter current contact is used in quench towers, then heat transfer efficiency is improved, but catalyst removal and fouling control are compromised

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveheat transfer efficiencyVSAvoidcatalyst removal efficiency
Core Design Contradiction:
Use of energy by moving objectVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The system uses counter-current contact in the quench chambers for efficient heat transfer, while simultaneously implementing segmentation into multiple chambers with specific catalyst removal structures. The first and second quench chambers are designed to work together, with the first chamber handling initial cooling and catalyst removal, and the second chamber continuing both functions. This segmented counter-current arrangement maintains heat transfer efficiency while improving catalyst removal through multiple stages.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

4Productivity

If quench towers are designed with higher capacity, then processing capability is improved, but capital costs increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveprocessing capabilityVSAvoidcapital costs
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSEase of manufacture

Solution Approach 1:

The quench tower is designed as a multi-functional system where the first quench chamber, second quench chamber, and neutralization chamber can be configured to handle multiple functions. The same basic chamber structure serves both cooling and catalyst removal functions, while the neutralization chamber handles acid neutralization. This multi-functionality reduces the need for separate dedicated equipment for each function, thereby reducing capital costs while maintaining high processing capability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Solution Approach 2:

The system optimizes operating parameters such as liquid-to-vapor ratios, temperature profiles, and flow rates to maximize processing capability within reasonable equipment dimensions. By carefully controlling these parameters, the tower achieves high throughput without requiring excessively large equipment, thereby balancing productivity with capital costs.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

The design effectively cools and desuperheats reactor effluents, removes catalyst fines, and neutralizes organic acids, preventing fouling and ensuring efficient operation while minimizing capital expenditures.

Implementation Method 1

The hot vaporous reactor effluent stream is directly contacted with the first quench liquid stream to cool the hot reactor effluent stream

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectHeat transfer: Conduction (thermal)

Implementation Method 2

passing the first quench liquid stream and the vaporous reactor effluent stream together through a bed while disengaging catalyst from the vaporous reactor effluent stream and transferring catalyst into the first quench liquid stream

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectMass transfer: Diffusion

Data Source

PatentUS11534732B2Process and apparatus for quenching a reactor effluent stream
Publication Date: 2022.12.27 UOP LLC
  • US11534732B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A process and apparatus cool and remove catalyst from a hot vaporous reactor effluent stream by feeding the hot vaporous reactor effluent stream comprising catalyst and a first quench liquid stream to a first quench chamber. The hot vaporous reactor effluent stream is directly contacted with the first quench liquid stream to cool the hot reactor effluent stream and wash catalyst therefrom into the first quench liquid stream. The first quench liquid stream and the vaporous reactor effluent stream are passed together through a bed while disengaging catalyst from the vaporous reactor effluent stream and transferring catalyst into the first quench liquid stream.