Query-Driven Summary Generation for Self-Media Articles

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Conventional summary generation methods fail to effectively address the demand for query-focused summaries, particularly in the context of self-media articles with incomplete narrative structures and unclear headlines, where users need direct answers to questions posed in the headlines.

Innovation Solution

A method and apparatus that acquire a target article, determine if a question is included in the headline, identify the relevant paragraph in the article body containing the answer, and generate a summary based on this information-satisfied-paragraph, including or excluding surrounding paragraphs as necessary to provide a coherent summary.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Loss of information

If conventional summary generation methods are used, then the summary covers key content of the article, but it does not directly answer users' questions posed in the headline

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveinformation satisfactionVSAvoiduser information demand satisfaction
Core Design Contradiction:
Loss of informationVSEase of operation

Solution Approach 1:

The patent segments the article into multiple paragraphs and identifies specific paragraphs that contain answers to questions in the headline. Instead of treating the article as a whole, the system divides it into manageable units and selectively processes those most relevant to user queries, thereby improving information satisfaction without requiring users to read the entire article.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The patent extracts the core question from the headline and identifies the specific paragraph containing the answer. By taking out only the relevant information-satisfied paragraph and generating the summary from that specific section, the system directly addresses user information demands while reducing unnecessary content in the summary.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

2Stability of the object's composition

If the summary includes more content to ensure coherence, then the narrative structure is improved, but the summary length increases and may include irrelevant information

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvenarrative structure coherenceVSAvoidsummary length
Core Design Contradiction:
Stability of the object's compositionVSLength of moving object

Solution Approach 1:

The patent dynamically adjusts the summary generation process based on the position of the information-satisfied paragraph within the article. When the answer paragraph is not at the beginning, the system adaptively includes preceding or following paragraphs to ensure narrative coherence, rather than using a fixed summary structure. This dynamic approach maintains readability while minimizing unnecessary content.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The patent applies different processing rules to different parts of the article based on their relationship to the information-satisfied paragraph. Specifically, it selectively includes only those surrounding paragraphs that are necessary for contextual coherence, rather than uniformly including all paragraphs. This local quality approach ensures narrative stability while controlling summary length.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

3Loss of information

If the system processes the entire article to generate a comprehensive summary, then all key content is covered, but the processing time and computational resources increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecontent coverageVSAvoidprocessing time
Core Design Contradiction:
Loss of informationVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The patent performs preliminary action by first identifying the question in the headline and locating the information-satisfied paragraph before generating the summary. This preliminary identification of the core answer paragraph allows the system to focus processing efforts only on relevant sections of the article, significantly reducing processing time while maintaining comprehensive coverage of key information.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The patent extracts and prioritizes the information-satisfied paragraph that contains the direct answer to the headline question. By taking out this core paragraph and using it as the foundation for summary generation, the system ensures comprehensive coverage of key content while avoiding the need to process and include all paragraphs, thereby reducing computational resources and processing time.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

Data Source

PatentUS11687715B2Summary generation method and apparatus
Publication Date: 2023.06.27 BEIJING BAIDU NETCOM SCI & TECH CO LTD
  • US11687715B2 patent drawing
  • US11687715B2 patent drawing
  • US11687715B2 patent drawing

AI summary

Embodiments of the application disclose a summary generation method and apparatus. A specific embodiment of the method comprises: acquiring a target article including a headline and a body of the article; determining whether a question is included in the headline; determining, in the body of the article, an information-satisfied-paragraph including an answer to the question, in response to determining that the question is included in the headline; and generating a summary of the target article based on the determined information-satisfied-paragraph. The above embodiment may generate a summary that directly satisfies the users' demand for information.