Query Evaluation for Image Retrieval and Conditional Generation

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing systems fail to automatically determine the most appropriate image retrieval or generation method for user queries, leading to inefficiencies, latency, and potential misrepresentation or inappropriate content display.

Innovation Solution

A query understanding and enrichment component uses machine learning-based models to evaluate natural language inputs, selecting between image retrieval, generation, or both, while minimizing latency and compute requirements, and ensuring contextually relevant outputs.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Ease of operation

If image retrieval or generation is performed for all user queries, then user experience is enhanced with relevant images, but computational resources and processing time are wasted on queries where images are unnecessary

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveuser experienceVSAvoidcomputational resources
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSUse of energy by moving object

Solution Approach 1:

The system segments the query processing workflow into distinct evaluation and execution phases. A query understanding component first evaluates whether image retrieval or generation is appropriate, separating necessary queries from unnecessary ones before proceeding to image processing operations.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The system performs preliminary evaluation of user queries to determine image processing appropriateness before actually executing image retrieval or generation. This advance assessment prevents wasteful computational resource allocation by identifying queries that do not require image processing.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

2Adaptability or versatility

If image generation is used for queries without recognized entities, then creative visual content is produced, but latency and compute requirements increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecontent generation capabilityVSAvoidprocessing latency
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The system segments image processing into two distinct paths: image retrieval for queries with recognized entities and image generation for queries without recognized entities. This segmentation allows the system to apply the most efficient method for each query type, reducing overall processing latency.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The system dynamically selects between image retrieval and image generation based on real-time analysis of query characteristics, specifically the presence or absence of recognized entities. This dynamic adaptation optimizes processing speed by choosing the faster appropriate method for each specific query.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

3Reliability

If a comprehensive query evaluation system is implemented to determine appropriate image processing, then inappropriate content is prevented, but device complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecontent appropriatenessVSAvoidsystem architecture
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system introduces a query understanding and enrichment component as an intermediary between query reception and image processing execution. This intermediary evaluates query appropriateness for image processing and enriches the query with contextual information, preventing inappropriate content while maintaining a clean separation of concerns.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

Solution Approach 2:

The query understanding component performs multiple functions within a single system element: evaluating image processing appropriateness, determining whether to retrieve or generate images, and enriching the query with contextual information. This multi-functionality reduces overall system complexity by consolidating evaluation tasks.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Data Source

PatentUS12468756B2Query evaluation for image retrieval and conditional image generation
Publication Date: 2025.11.11 AMAZON TECH INC
  • US12468756B2 patent drawing
  • US12468756B2 patent drawing
  • US12468756B2 patent drawing

AI summary

Techniques are generally described for query evaluation for image retrieval and image generation. In various examples, a first encoded representation of first natural language input data may be generated. An image retrieval process may be selected from among the image retrieval process and an image generation process based at least in part on the first encoded representation of the first natural language input data. A second natural language encoder may generate a second encoded representation of the first natural language input data. The second encoded representation may be used to determine first image data stored in a first data repository. The first image data may be sent for output on a display of a first computing device.