Query-Focused Summarization via Extractor-Abstractor Segmentation

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing query-focused summarization models are inefficient in generating summaries that accurately answer user-specified queries, often failing to capture all relevant content due to length limitations and reliance on two-step approaches that separate extraction and abstraction processes.

Innovation Solution

The implementation of a two-step query-focused summarization model that includes an extractor model to score and rank passages based on relevance, using a relevance model trained on QFS data, and an abstractor model to synthesize the final summary, along with an end-to-end encoder-decoder model that splits the source document into fixed-length segments for joint encoding and decoding, allowing for richer data representations and improved relevance prediction.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Measurement precision

If a two-step approach with separate extractor and abstractor models is used, then the summarization process can be more targeted to user queries, but the system complexity increases and processing efficiency decreases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvequery relevance accuracyVSAvoidmodel architecture complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent divides the summarization task into two distinct modules: an extractor model that identifies query-relevant passages and an abstractor model that generates the final summary. This segmentation allows each component to specialize in one aspect of the task, improving overall query relevance accuracy while maintaining manageable complexity through clear separation of concerns.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The extractor model serves as an intermediary component between the input document and the abstractor model. It processes the document to identify and extract relevant passages based on the query, then passes these extracted segments to the abstractor. This intermediary step improves precision by ensuring the abstractor only processes query-relevant information rather than the entire document.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

2Loss of information

If the source document is processed in full by the model, then all relevant information can be captured, but the processing time and computational resources increase significantly

Engineering Contradiction:
Improverelevance coverageVSAvoidprocessing time
Core Design Contradiction:
Loss of informationVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The extractor model extracts only the query-relevant passages from the source document, separating the essential information needed to answer the query from the rest of the document. This extraction process reduces the amount of text passed to the abstractor model, significantly decreasing processing time while maintaining coverage of all query-relevant information.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

Solution Approach 2:

Instead of processing the entire document, the system applies partial action by processing only the extracted relevant passages. The extractor identifies and extracts specific segments that contain information necessary to answer the query, allowing the abstractor to focus computational resources on synthesizing these partial results rather than analyzing the complete document.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #16Partial or excessive action

3Ease of operation

If the summary length is constrained to fit user needs, then the output becomes more usable, but relevant content may be omitted due to length limitations

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesummary usabilityVSAvoidrelevant content coverage
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSLoss of information

Solution Approach 1:

The system applies local quality by concentrating summarization efforts on query-relevant passages rather than attempting to summarize the entire document uniformly. The extractor identifies specific local segments containing answers to the query, and the abstractor synthesizes these segments into a concise summary that fits user length constraints while preserving all locally relevant information.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Solution Approach 2:

The extractor model extracts only the specific passages that contain information necessary to answer the query, filtering out irrelevant content before summarization. This extraction ensures that the subsequent summary, even with length constraints, contains all essential relevant information while excluding unnecessary details, thereby maintaining both usability and completeness.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

Data Source

PatentUS20240370640A1Systems and methods for query-focused summarization
Publication Date: 2024.11.07 SALESFORCE INC
  • US20240370640A1 patent drawing
  • US20240370640A1 patent drawing
  • US20240370640A1 patent drawing

AI summary

Embodiments described herein provide a query-focused summarization model that employs a single or dual encoder model. A two-step approach may be adopted that first extracts parts of the source document and then synthesizes the extracted segments into a final summary. In another embodiment, an end-to-end approach may be adopted that splits the source document into overlapping segments, and then concatenates encodings into a single embedding sequence for the decoder to output a summary.