Information Retrieval System Query Refinement and Result Ranking

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Conventional information-retrieval systems face challenges in processing poorly defined user queries, resulting in overwhelming search results that are time-consuming to sift through and often lack relevance.

Innovation Solution

An enhanced information-retrieval system comprising a database, server, preprocessing, switchboard, and post-processing modules that refine user queries, suggest alternatives, classify queries, select appropriate search engines, administer searches, and modify search results to improve relevance, using taxonomies, ontologies, and social feedback to enhance user experience.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Quantity of substance

If conventional search engines return all matching documents, then the quantity of search results is maximized, but the time required to identify relevant documents increases significantly

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvequantity of search resultsVSAvoidtime to identify relevant documents
Core Design Contradiction:
Quantity of substanceVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs preliminary actions by pre-computing and storing relevance weights, taxonomies, and ontologies before the actual search query is processed. This allows the search engine to quickly filter and rank results using pre-established criteria, reducing the time users need to sift through results while maintaining comprehensive result sets.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The patent replaces manual sifting and filtering of search results with automated computational mechanisms. The system uses algorithmic processing to automatically rank, filter, and organize search results based on multiple criteria including relevance weights, user profiles, and document metadata, eliminating the need for users to manually evaluate each result.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

2Reliability

If the system performs comprehensive query analysis and result refinement, then the relevance of search results is improved, but the complexity of the system increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improverelevance of search resultsVSAvoidsystem complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system segments the complex information retrieval process into distinct functional modules: query analysis module, document retrieval module, relevance weighting module, and result ranking module. Each module handles a specific aspect of the search process, making the overall system more manageable and maintainable while achieving comprehensive result refinement through coordinated operation of these specialized components.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The patent introduces intermediary data structures including taxonomies, ontologies, and pre-computed relevance weights that mediate between the user's query and the final search results. These intermediaries translate user intent into structured criteria and transform raw document matches into ranked, relevant results, reducing the direct complexity of the query-processing relationship.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

3Reliability

If the system applies multiple processing modules including preprocessing and postprocessing, then the quality of search results is enhanced, but the processing time increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvequality of search resultsVSAvoidprocessing time
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDuration of action of moving object

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs preliminary processing during system initialization and document indexing, creating pre-computed relevance weights, taxonomies, and ontologies before actual search queries are processed. This shifts processing workload from query-time to offline preparation, reducing the time impact of multiple processing modules during actual search operations while maintaining enhanced result quality.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Data Source

PatentUS9092756B2Information-retrieval systems, methods and software with content relevancy enhancements
Publication Date: 2015.07.28 THOMSON REUTERS ENTERPRISE CENTRE GMBH
  • US9092756B2 patent drawing
  • US9092756B2 patent drawing
  • US9092756B2 patent drawing

AI summary

The present inventors devised, among other things, systems, methods, and software for enhancing the relevancy of content presented to users in response to queries in an online information retrieval system. One exemplary system refines a user input query by making suggestions of alternatives queries. A switchboard module converts the refined query, administers one or more searches, and collects search results from one or more search engines based on the refined query. And, a post-processor module refines the collected search results by, for example, modifying the order of the results, removing inappropriate or undesirable content from the results, and/or applying historical performance analysis, based for example on social feedback.