Query Relevance Scoring via Category-Specific Selection Frequencies

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current internet search engines face challenges in accurately determining user intent and relevance of search results, as they rely on general assumptions about user preferences and do not effectively utilize specific user behaviors and interests to adjust rankings.

Innovation Solution

The system processes prior queries and user activities to generate adjusted scores for search results based on category-specific and general selection frequencies, incorporating demographic and location information to refine search result rankings.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Productivity

If general assumptions about user preferences are used to rank search results, then the search engine can process queries efficiently, but the relevance and accuracy of search results deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvequery processing efficiencyVSAvoidsearch result relevance
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSMeasurement precision

Solution Approach 1:

The patent segments users into different categories based on their search behavior patterns, demographics, and location. By dividing the user base into distinct segments (e.g., mobile users, desktop users, location-specific users), the system can apply customized ranking strategies to each segment rather than using a single general approach, thereby improving relevance while maintaining efficiency through automated segmentation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The patent dynamically changes ranking parameters based on user characteristics, device type, location, and search history. Instead of using fixed ranking parameters, the system adjusts parameters such as recency weighting, location relevance, and user preference factors according to the specific user context, improving measurement precision without significantly impacting processing efficiency.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

2Measurement precision

If user-specific clues such as device type and location are incorporated into search results, then search result relevance improves, but system complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesearch result relevanceVSAvoidsystem complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent implements a universal ranking framework that handles multiple user characteristics (device type, location, search history, demographics) through a single multi-functional system. Rather than creating separate systems for each user attribute, the ranking algorithm integrates all these factors into one unified process, improving relevance while avoiding the complexity of multiple independent systems.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Solution Approach 2:

The system automatically collects and processes user-specific information (device type, location, search patterns) without requiring manual input or complex configuration. The ranking algorithm self-adjusts based on the data it receives, reducing the need for manual system management and lowering operational complexity while maintaining high relevance.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

3Measurement precision

If search results are adjusted based on category-specific selection frequencies, then relevance for specific user categories improves, but the complexity of score adjustment increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecategory-specific relevanceVSAvoidscoring system complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent pre-calculates and stores selection frequency statistics for different user categories and search result categories during off-peak times. By performing this computation in advance rather than in real-time, the system reduces the complexity of score adjustment during actual search operations, as the pre-computed statistics can be directly applied without complex real-time calculations.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The patent introduces selection frequency statistics as an intermediary layer between user queries and search result ranking. Instead of directly analyzing complex user behavior patterns in real-time, the system uses pre-computed selection frequencies as a mediator to adjust rankings, simplifying the scoring process while maintaining category-specific relevance.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

Data Source

PatentUS9390143B2Recent interest based relevance scoring
Publication Date: 2016.07.12 GOOGLE LLC
  • US9390143B2 patent drawing
  • US9390143B2 patent drawing
  • US9390143B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A computer-implemented method for processing query information includes receiving prior queries followed by a current query, the prior and current queries being received within an activity period an originating with a search requester. The method also includes receiving a plurality of search results based on the current query. Each search result identifying a search result document, each respective search result document being associated with a query specific score indicating a relevance of the document to the current query. The method also includes determining a first category based, at least in part, on the prior queries. The method also includes identifying a plurality of prior activity periods of other search requesters, each prior activity period containing a prior activity query where the prior activity query matches the current query, and where the prior activity period indicates the same first category.