Query Tree Navigation via Keyword Analysis

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing query tree systems in call centers and help desks often lead callers astray due to misunderstood questions or unrecognizable voice responses, causing frustration and inefficiency, especially when users are not familiar with the terminology or make mistakes in navigating the system.

Innovation Solution

A computer-implemented method that navigates a query tree by analyzing user responses to identify branching criteria and keywords, comparing them to associated keywords, and redirecting the user to the appropriate node, ensuring accurate navigation and providing relevant information.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Productivity

If automated query tree systems are used to reduce operational costs, then labor costs are reduced, but user frustration increases due to misunderstood questions and unrecognizable voice responses

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveoperational efficiencyVSAvoiduser frustration
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSObject-affected harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The system continuously monitors user interactions and feedback signals to detect when a caller is confused or encountering difficulties. When feedback indicates user frustration or navigation errors, the system automatically adjusts its behavior by providing guidance, repeating questions, or offering alternative navigation paths, thereby reducing user frustration while maintaining automated operation

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Solution Approach 2:

The system performs preliminary actions by anticipating potential user errors before they occur. It pre-provides guidance hints, validates user inputs in advance, and prepares alternative navigation paths so that when users make mistakes, the system can quickly correct them without increasing frustration or requiring human intervention

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

2Extent of automation

If voice recognition techniques are used for automated navigation, then automation level increases, but navigation accuracy decreases due to misunderstood or unrecognizable voice responses

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveautomation levelVSAvoidnavigation accuracy
Core Design Contradiction:
Extent of automationVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The system introduces an intermediary validation layer between voice recognition and navigation decisions. This intermediary component analyzes voice recognition outputs, cross-references them with contextual information, and verifies accuracy before executing navigation changes. The intermediary acts as a buffer that filters out misrecognitions while preserving high automation levels

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

Solution Approach 2:

The system applies beforehand cushioning by implementing error tolerance mechanisms and recovery protocols that are activated only when voice recognition failures occur. It cushions against navigation errors by having pre-prepared alternative paths and guidance mechanisms that kick in automatically when recognition accuracy drops, maintaining both high automation and reliable navigation

Inventive Principle:
Principle #11Beforehand cushioning (Prior cushioning)

3Reliability

If numerical responses with detailed explanations are used for navigation, then recognition accuracy improves, but the complexity of questions increases making them difficult for callers to remember and evaluate

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveresponse recognition accuracyVSAvoidease of navigation
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSEase of operation

Solution Approach 1:

The system segments the navigation process into multiple simple steps rather than presenting complex multi-option questions at once. It breaks down the decision tree into sequential binary choices or limited-set questions, each with clear and simple prompts. This segmentation maintains high recognition accuracy through clear options while improving ease of operation by reducing cognitive load on callers

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The system dynamically adapts the complexity of questions based on real-time analysis of caller responses and navigation progress. When callers show confusion or take time to respond, the system automatically simplifies subsequent questions and provides additional guidance. This dynamic adjustment maintains recognition accuracy while continuously optimizing ease of operation for each individual caller

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Data Source

PatentUS10031983B2Query tree navigation
Publication Date: 2018.07.24 INTERNATIONAL BUSINESS MACHINE CORPORATION
  • US10031983B2 patent drawing
  • US10031983B2 patent drawing
  • US10031983B2 patent drawing

AI summary

System, computer implemented method and computer program product for preparing and navigating a query tree including a plurality of query nodes and informational nodes. Each query node is associated with a prompt, branching criteria and keywords. A current query node provides a prompt to a user and a user response is received and analyzed to identify branching criteria and keywords from the user response. The method navigates to another node in the query tree in consideration of the branching criteria received in the user response and a comparison between the keywords received in the user response and the keywords associated with the query nodes. The comparison may validate navigation to a destination node corresponding to the branching criteria or the comparison may indicate incorrect navigation of the query tree. Corrective navigation can be implemented in various ways based upon the keywords received in the user response.