Question Answering Prioritization for High-Volume Query Handling

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

In multi-user online intelligent question answering scenarios, computing devices struggle to efficiently process a large volume of questions, particularly when faced with meaningless or repetitive queries, leading to paralysis of the entire question answering procedure due to insufficient processing capacity.

Innovation Solution

An intelligent question answering method that evaluates the importance of questions based on various influencing factors, determines the answering importance degree, and selectively provides answers with varying degrees of detail, utilizing semantic clustering to identify fundamental questions and incorporating network answers for enriched responses.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Productivity

If all questions are answered indiscriminately in retrieval-based intelligent question answering, then user coverage is improved, but computing device processing capacity is exhausted and important questions cannot be processed

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvequestion answering throughputVSAvoidimportant question processing reliability
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies local quality by differentiating question processing based on importance evaluation. Questions are classified into different importance levels (e.g., high, medium, low priority) and processed accordingly - high importance questions receive detailed processing while low importance questions receive simplified or aggregated processing. This allows the system to allocate computing resources dynamically based on question characteristics rather than treating all questions uniformly.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Solution Approach 2:

The patent segments the question answering process into multiple stages: question reception, importance evaluation, and selective answering. By introducing an importance evaluation module that analyzes questions before processing, the system divides the workflow to filter and prioritize questions, preventing unnecessary processing of low-value questions from exhausting system capacity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

2Measurement precision

If retrieval-based question answering is used with fixed corpus database, then answer accuracy for known questions is improved, but adaptability to new and varied questions deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveanswer accuracyVSAvoidquestion variety handling capability
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSAdaptability or versatility

Solution Approach 1:

The patent introduces dynamic adaptability by allowing the system to adjust its answering strategy based on real-time question characteristics. The importance evaluation module dynamically assesses each question and modifies processing depth accordingly. For novel or complex questions not found in the corpus, the system can generate answers based on evaluated importance rather than failing completely, thus adapting to varied question types while maintaining accuracy for known questions.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Data Source

PatentUS20260056989A1Intelligent Question Answering Method and Apparatus, Computing Device, Program Product, and Storage Medium
Publication Date: 2026.02.26 HUAWEI CLOUD COMPUTING TECHNOLOGIES CO LTD
  • US20260056989A1 patent drawing
  • US20260056989A1 patent drawing
  • US20260056989A1 patent drawing

AI summary

An intelligent question answering method includes receiving an original question; determining an importance evaluation result of the original question based on the original question, where the importance evaluation result indicates an answering importance degree of the original question, and the importance evaluation result is determined based on at least one evaluation influencing factor; determining, based on the importance evaluation result, an answer corresponding to the original question in at least one candidate answer, where the at least one candidate answer has a different degree of detail; and outputting the answer corresponding to the original question. That is, importance of the original question is evaluated, and a degree of detail for answering the original question is determined based on the importance evaluation result.