Queue Chute Material Handling System for High-Rise Buildings

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Conventional material handling systems for high-rise buildings face issues such as user exposure to suction forces, energy inefficiency due to air leakage, noise, and limited simultaneous user access, as they rely on direct vacuum connections and lack queue management capabilities.

Innovation Solution

The introduction of a material handling system with queue chutes that allow materials to accumulate before entering the main chute, featuring vertically extending queue chutes connected to loading stations, gates for controlled access, and level sensors for fullness detection, enabling efficient material flow and multiple user access.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Speed

If direct vacuum connections are used in conventional material handling systems, then materials can be quickly evacuated, but user exposure to suction forces occurs and loose items are disposed of along with laundry

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvematerial evacuation speedVSAvoiduser exposure to suction forces
Core Design Contradiction:
SpeedVSObject-affected harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

A queue chute is introduced as an intermediary component between the loading station and the main chute. The queue chute receives materials from the loading station and temporarily holds them before they are evacuated through the main chute by vacuum force. This intermediary structure prevents direct exposure of users to suction forces while maintaining efficient material evacuation capability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

2Productivity

If direct vacuum connections are used, then materials are quickly removed, but heated or cooled air is lost from the building increasing utility costs

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvematerial disposal efficiencyVSAvoidheated or cooled air loss
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSLoss of energy

Solution Approach 1:

The queue chute serves as a sealed intermediary chamber that allows materials to be transferred from the loading station without creating direct openings to the building interior. The gate mechanism controls access between the queue chute and main chute, preventing uncontrolled air leakage while maintaining continuous material disposal operation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

Solution Approach 2:

Materials are pre-loaded into the queue chute through the loading station before vacuum evacuation begins. This preliminary loading action allows the system to prepare material batches in advance, enabling controlled gate opening and closing sequences that minimize air leakage while maintaining continuous operational productivity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

3Productivity

If conventional vacuum systems operate continuously, then materials are evacuated efficiently, but the systems are noisy and violent

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvematerial evacuation efficiencyVSAvoidnoise and violent operation
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSObject-generated harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The gate between the queue chute and main chute operates periodically rather than continuously. Materials accumulate in the queue chute during loading phases, then the gate opens in controlled periodic cycles to allow vacuum evacuation. This periodic operation reduces noise and violent forces compared to continuous vacuum operation, while maintaining overall evacuation efficiency.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #19Periodic action

4Reliability

If lockout mechanisms are installed to prevent unwanted access, then system security is improved, but multiple users cannot access the system simultaneously

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesystem access controlVSAvoidsimultaneous user access
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSEase of operation

Solution Approach 1:

The system is segmented into multiple independent loading stations, each with its own queue chute and gate mechanism. This segmentation allows multiple users to access different loading stations simultaneously without interfering with each other, while each station maintains its own access control and security features. The modular structure resolves the contradiction between security and simultaneous accessibility.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

This system enhances operational efficiency by preventing energy waste, allowing multiple users to access the system simultaneously, and prioritizing material disposal, while maintaining system integrity and reducing noise and contamination risks.

Implementation Method 1

a chute pulling a constant vacuum

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectVacuum: Vacuum

Implementation Method 2

the suction force created by the vacuum system

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectSuction force: Suction

Implementation Method 3

gravity-assisted or vacuum-assisted queue chutes

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectGravity: Gravitation

Data Source

PatentUS9725253B2Material handling system with queue chute
Publication Date: 2017.08.08 PRECISION AIRCONVEY CORP
  • US9725253B2 patent drawing
  • US9725253B2 patent drawing
  • US9725253B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A material handling system for the disposal of materials in multi-floor buildings. The material handling system has one or more main chutes each having one or more sets of loading stations, queue chutes, and gates. The queue chutes store material to be disposed, which is held back from entering into the main chute by the gate. The material is loaded into the queue chute via an opening in the loading station. The opening of the gates is controlled using a material handling system controller, which is controlled via a control panel or automatically using a timer or based upon the output of one or more level sensors that can determine the fullness of the queue chutes. The main chutes can have primary gates to allow for safe maintenance of the system. The loading stations can have secondary access to the main chutes.