Quinoline Anthelmintic Compounds for Resistant Heartworm Treatment

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

The emergence of resistant worm populations against existing anthelmintic compounds poses a significant challenge in effectively treating helminth infections in mammals, particularly in pets like dogs and cats, with heartworm disease being a severe and often fatal condition.

Innovation Solution

Development of new anthelmintic compounds, specifically those with a quinoline structure, that target parasitic helminths such as Dirofilaria immitis, offering compatibility with standard antiparasitic treatments and minimal side effects, and can be administered orally or topically.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If existing anthelmintic compounds are used to treat helminth infections, then treatment effectiveness is reduced, but worm populations develop resistance

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvetreatment effectivenessVSAvoidworm resistance
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSObject-affected harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies parameter changes by modifying the chemical structure of anthelmintic compounds through various substituents (R1-R6, R8-R12) on the quinoline core. This structural variation creates new compounds with potentially different biological activities that can overcome existing worm resistance while maintaining treatment effectiveness.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Solution Approach 2:

The invention uses composite molecular structures combining a quinoline core with diverse substituent groups (halogens, alkyl chains, heterocyclic rings, carbonyl groups). These composite structures aim to achieve synergistic effects that enhance anthelmintic activity while reducing resistance development.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #40Composite materials

2Object-affected harmful factors

If new anthelmintic compounds with quinoline structure are developed, then resistance issues are reduced, but treatment compatibility and side effect profile must be optimized

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveworm resistanceVSAvoidtreatment compatibility
Core Design Contradiction:
Object-affected harmful factorsVSAdaptability or versatility

Solution Approach 1:

The patent systematically varies chemical parameters (substituent types, positions, and combinations) to optimize the balance between anthelmintic efficacy and host compatibility. By adjusting molecular properties, the compounds aim to achieve selective toxicity against worms while minimizing side effects in mammalian hosts.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Ease of operation

If anthelmintic compounds are administered orally or topically, then treatment ease is improved, but systemic side effects may increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveadministration convenienceVSAvoidhost side effects
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSObject-generated harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The chemical structure parameters of the quinoline compounds are optimized to achieve appropriate pharmacokinetic properties. By adjusting molecular weight, lipophilicity, and functional groups, the compounds aim to achieve effective absorption through oral or topical routes while limiting systemic distribution and reducing potential side effects.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Data Source

PatentUS12509449B2Anthelmintic compounds comprising a quinoline structure
Publication Date: 2025.12.30 INTERVET INC
  • US12509449B2 patent drawing
  • US12509449B2 patent drawing
  • US12509449B2 patent drawing

AI summary

The present invention relates to new anthelmintic compounds. These compounds can for example be used in the treatment of the kind of worm disease caused by helminths such as Dirofilaria, in particular Dirofilaria immitis.