R-Aware Charging Algorithm for Battery Capacity Fading Reduction

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Fast charging technologies for mobile devices accelerate battery capacity fading due to their constant current and voltage charging methods, which are not adaptable to users' available charging time, often leading to incomplete charging and premature termination of the constant voltage phase, thereby shortening battery life.

Innovation Solution

The R-Aware charging algorithm adjusts the charging process based on users' available time by introducing a relaxation-aware approach that triggers the constant voltage phase earlier and optimizes charging parameters such as threshold voltage, constant current, and current cutoff to maximize charged capacity while ensuring battery relaxation.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Speed

If fast charging technology with high charging rate is used, then charging speed is improved, but battery capacity fading is accelerated

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecharging speedVSAvoidbattery capacity fading
Core Design Contradiction:
SpeedVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The charging algorithm dynamically adjusts charging parameters based on user available time. It transitions from static CCCV charging to a dynamic two-phase approach where the first phase uses high current for speed and the second phase uses reduced current to complete charging within user-defined time windows, adapting the charging profile to temporal constraints

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The invention changes charging parameters by introducing a time-based control mechanism. It modifies the charging current profile from constant to time-varying, where the current is adjusted based on the user's available charging time, enabling the system to optimize between speed and battery health based on temporal availability

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

2Productivity

If CCCV charging method is used, then charging efficiency is improved, but battery relaxation is insufficient leading to faster capacity fading

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecharging efficiencyVSAvoidbattery capacity fading
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The charging process is segmented into two distinct phases: a first charging phase using high current for efficiency, and a second charging phase with reduced current for battery relaxation. This segmentation allows the system to achieve both high charging efficiency and adequate battery relaxation by separating the conflicting requirements into sequential operational stages

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The invention applies partial CCCV charging followed by a relaxation phase. Instead of continuous high-current charging, it uses high current only for the first phase and then reduces current in the second phase to provide sufficient relaxation, applying excessive action (high current) only when necessary and partial action (reduced current) when relaxation is needed

Inventive Principle:
Principle #16Partial or excessive action

3Ease of operation

If user-unaware charging is used, then charging simplicity is maintained, but charging time optimization is lost

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecharging simplicityVSAvoidcharging time optimization
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The system implements feedback by obtaining user input regarding available charging time and using this information to adjust the charging profile. The charging algorithm receives feedback about user temporal constraints and modifies its operation accordingly, creating a closed-loop system that adapts to user needs while maintaining simplicity through automated decision-making

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

4Loss of time

If CV-Chg phase is shortened or skipped, then charging time is reduced, but battery relaxation is compromised

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecharging timeVSAvoidbattery relaxation
Core Design Contradiction:
Loss of timeVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The invention applies partial CV-Chg phase by using high current only for the first phase and then reducing current in the second phase. This partial application of high-current charging followed by a relaxation phase ensures that sufficient relaxation time is provided while still achieving the majority of charging during the high-efficiency first phase, preventing complete skipping of the relaxation period

Inventive Principle:
Principle #16Partial or excessive action

Data Source

PatentUS11258285B2User aware charging algorithm that reduces battery fading
Publication Date: 2022.02.22 THE RGT UNIV OF MICHIGAN
  • US11258285B2 patent drawing
  • US11258285B2 patent drawing
  • US11258285B2 patent drawing

AI summary

An user-interactive charging paradigm is presented that tailors the device charging to the user's real-time needs. The core of approach is a relaxation-aware charging algorithm that maximizes the charged capacity within the user's available time and slows down the battery's capacity fading. The approach also integrates relaxation-aware charging algorithm existing fast charging algorithms via a user-interactive interface, allowing users to choose a charging method based on their real-time needs. The relaxation-aware charging algorithm is shown to slow down the battery fading by over 36% on average, and up to 60% in extreme cases, when compared with existing fast charging solutions. Such fading slowdown translates to, for instance, an up to 2-hour extension of the LTE time for a Nexus 5X phone after 2-year usage, revealed by a trace-driven analysis based on 976 charging cases collected from 7 users over 3 months.