Restricted Target Wake Time Coordination Between Access Points

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing wireless communication systems face challenges in coordinating restricted target wake time (r-TWT) schedules between access points (APs) in different basic service sets (BSS) and overlapping BSS (OBSS), which affects latency-sensitive applications.

Innovation Solution

The implementation of r-TWT coordination between APs in a BSS and APs in an OBSS, where APs negotiate and agree on r-TWT schedules, and APs in the BSS respect the r-TWT schedules of APs in the OBSS by adjusting their transmission opportunities (TXOP) and using beacon frames, action frames, and RTS/CTS exchanges to ensure synchronization and clock drift adjustments.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If APs in different BSS and OBSS operate independently with their own r-TWT schedules, then each AP can maintain its own schedule flexibility, but interference occurs between overlapping schedules causing unpredictable latency

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvelatency predictabilityVSAvoidschedule coordination complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent merges r-TWT schedule information from multiple APs (both own AP and neighboring APs) into a coordinated schedule. APs exchange r-TWT setup frames containing their schedule parameters (service period start time, interval, duration) and negotiate non-overlapping time slots. This combining of schedule information from distributed APs resolves the latency predictability issue while managing coordination complexity through standardized frame exchange protocols.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

2Loss of time

If APs negotiate and respect r-TWT schedules across BSS boundaries, then latency-sensitive applications achieve predictable performance, but the coordination mechanism increases system complexity

Engineering Contradiction:
ImprovelatencyVSAvoidcoordination overhead
Core Design Contradiction:
Loss of timeVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent implements preliminary action by having APs negotiate and establish r-TWT schedules in advance before actual data transmission occurs. APs exchange r-TWT setup frames to pre-coordinate service period timings, ensuring that latency-sensitive applications can immediately utilize the pre-negotiated time slots without additional negotiation overhead during actual transmission. This preliminary coordination reduces real-time latency while managing complexity through advance planning.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

3Use of energy by moving object

If APs use traditional TWT schedules, then power efficiency is improved, but latency-sensitive applications cannot meet strict timing requirements

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvepower efficiencyVSAvoidlatency
Core Design Contradiction:
Use of energy by moving objectVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies local quality by creating different schedule characteristics for different application types. Within the same BSS or OBSS, latency-sensitive applications receive dedicated r-TWT service periods with strict timing guarantees (shorter intervals, guaranteed TXOP), while other applications can use traditional TWT schedules with more flexible timing. This localized differentiation allows simultaneous optimization for both power efficiency (traditional TWT) and latency (r-TWT) depending on application requirements.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Data Source

PatentUS20250150967A1Device, system, and method for restricted target wake time coordination between access points
Publication Date: 2025.05.08 NXP USA INC
  • US20250150967A1 patent drawing
  • US20250150967A1 patent drawing
  • US20250150967A1 patent drawing

AI summary

A method and system for restricted target wake time (r-TWT) coordination where a first AP in a basic service set (BSS) respects an r-TWT schedule of a second AP, where the second AP is in an overlapping basic service set (OBSS). The first AP acquires the r-TWT schedule of the second AP and indicates to the second AP that the first AP respects the r-TWT schedule of the second AP. The first AP provides to a station associated with the first AP an indication of the r-TWT schedule of the second AP to cause a frame exchange with the STA of the first AP to end at a beginning of a r-TWT service period of the second AP to respect the r-TWT schedule of the second AP.