Racetrack Memory Array With Integrated MTJ and Sandwiched Electrodes

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Conventional racetrack memory (RTM) manufacturing faces challenges such as high risk of damaging the exposed RT layer during electrode etching, poor yield due to incomplete etching, difficulty in increasing chip density, and impediment to spin torque switching due to the thick MgO barrier, which limits current passage and nucleation of domain walls.

Innovation Solution

The RTM layer sequence is rearranged with a metallization layer forming one pair of electrodes as the bottom layer and another as the outermost layer, sandwiching the RT and MTJ layers, allowing for minimized footprint, increased on-off TMR ratio, and reduced voltage and current density, enabling efficient nucleation and thermal stability.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Ease of manufacture

If the RT layer is arranged on the bottom and MTJ layer on top with electrodes on top for read/write operations, then the device structure is conventional and manufacturing is straightforward, but the exposed RT layer is at high risk of damage during etching of the top metallic layer and the yield is poor

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveconventional manufacturing sequenceVSAvoidyield
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of manufactureVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The patent inverts the conventional layer arrangement by placing the MTJ layer on the bottom and the RT layer on top. This inversion allows the RT layer to be protected by subsequent layers during manufacturing, eliminating the risk of over-etching damage while maintaining conventional manufacturing processes. The inverted structure enables the read/write electrodes to be formed without exposing the delicate RT layer to harmful etching processes.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #13The other way round (Inversion)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent transitions from a planar electrode arrangement to a three-dimensional stacked configuration where electrodes are distributed across multiple layers (bottom and top). This dimensional change allows simultaneous access to the RT layer from both sides, enabling read/write operations while protecting the RT layer from damage during electrode formation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #17Another dimension (Dimensionality change)

2Ease of manufacture

If electrodes are arranged all on top for interconnection, then the manufacturing is simple, but the chip density cannot be increased due to large footprint and distance between electrodes

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveelectrode arrangementVSAvoidchip footprint
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of manufactureVSArea of stationary object

Solution Approach 1:

The patent utilizes vertical stacking to arrange electrodes in multiple layers (bottom and top) rather than spreading them out in a single plane. This three-dimensional arrangement dramatically reduces the horizontal footprint of the device while maintaining all necessary electrical connections, thereby increasing chip density without complicating the manufacturing process.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #17Another dimension (Dimensionality change)

3Strength

If a thick MgO barrier is used between MTJ layer and RT layer, then the barrier strength is sufficient, but spin torque switching is impeded or impossible due to limited voltage across the barrier

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvebarrier strengthVSAvoidspin torque switching
Core Design Contradiction:
StrengthVSEase of operation

Solution Approach 1:

The patent extracts or removes the thick MgO barrier layer that was preventing spin torque switching. By eliminating this barrier, high currents can now pass through to enable domain wall nucleation and spin torque switching operations. The barrier function is replaced by the inherent magnetic properties of the layered structure, allowing both protection and electrical functionality.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

4Ease of manufacture

If the RT layer is exposed for electrode manufacturing, then the manufacturing process is straightforward, but the RT layer is damaged during etching of the metallic layer

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveelectrode manufacturingVSAvoidover-etching damage
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of manufactureVSObject-affected harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The patent inverts the manufacturing sequence by forming electrodes on the bottom layer first, then stacking subsequent layers including the RT layer. This inversion ensures the RT layer is never exposed during electrode manufacturing, completely eliminating the risk of over-etching damage while maintaining manufacturing simplicity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #13The other way round (Inversion)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent performs the electrode formation action preliminarily, before the RT layer is deposited. By creating the electrode structure first and then stacking protective layers over it, the RT layer is shielded from all subsequent etching processes, preventing damage while maintaining manufacturing efficiency.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

This approach minimizes device footprint, enhances on-off TMR ratio, improves thermal stability, and increases writing speed by reducing stray tunneling current and channel resistance, while allowing for efficient domain wall nucleation and scaling down of the device.

Implementation Method 1

the MTJ is used to read out the device by sensing the magnetization of the strip as domain walls are shifted along the racetrack

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectMagnetic tunnel junction sensing: Magnetoresistance

Implementation Method 2

the most advantageous racetracks are formed from thin magnetic layers that exhibit a significant perpendicular magnetic anisotropy (PMA) which means that the magnetization either points out of or into the substrate-plane

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectPerpendicular magnetic anisotropy (PMA): Anisotropy

Implementation Method 3

Multiple magnetic domain walls are shifted through and along the racetrack driven by current pulses which are passed along the racetrack

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectCurrent-controlled domain wall motion: Lorentz Force

Implementation Method 4

Recent developments, especially spin-orbit torques (SOTs) and exchange coupling torques (ECTs) yield an highly efficient current-induced DW motion

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectSpin-orbit torques (SOTs):

Implementation Method 5

enabling efficient nucleation and thermal stability

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectMagnetic domain wall nucleation: Nucleation

Implementation Method 6

Recent developments, especially spin-orbit torques (SOTs) and exchange coupling torques (ECTs) yield an highly efficient current-induced DW motion

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectExchange coupling torques (ECTs):

Data Source

PatentUS20240407177A11-bit 3-terminal racetrack array with integated magnetic tunnel junction (MTJ)
Publication Date: 2024.12.05 MAX PLANCK GESELLSCHAFT ZUR FOERDERUNG DER WISSENSCHAFTEN EV
  • US20240407177A1 patent drawing
  • US20240407177A1 patent drawing
  • US20240407177A1 patent drawing

AI summary

The present invention relates to racetrack memory array devices, and more specifically, to a manufacturing method of racetrack memory arrays with integrated magnetic tunnel junction for read/write.