RACH Resource Selection Using SRS for Cross-Link Interference Mitigation

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Wireless communication systems face interference issues, particularly cross-link interference (CLI), during random access channel (RACH) procedures when operating in full duplex mode, which can impact connection establishment and configuration.

Innovation Solution

Communication devices measure and report CLI using reference signals, such as SRS, to select optimal RACH occasions based on signal strength, enabling the network to adjust resources to mitigate interference.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Productivity

If full duplex mode is used for random access channel procedures, then spectrum efficiency is improved, but cross-link interference increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvespectrum efficiencyVSAvoidcross-link interference
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSObject-affected harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies preliminary action by having the UE perform CLI measurement before the RACH procedure to determine whether to use a full duplex RO. The UE measures the reference signal in advance, compares the signal strength against a threshold, and only proceeds with full duplex RACH if the measurement indicates acceptable interference levels, thereby preventing harmful interference before it occurs.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The patent implements feedback by having the UE report CLI measurement results to the network, which then provides feedback in the form of a bitmap indicating which ROs are suitable for full duplex operation. This feedback mechanism allows the system to adapt and select appropriate ROs based on actual interference conditions, balancing spectrum efficiency with interference mitigation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

2Reliability

If CLI measurement is performed before RACH procedure, then interference mitigation is improved, but latency increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveinterference mitigationVSAvoidlatency
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies preliminary action by performing CLI measurement in advance before the RACH procedure, allowing the UE to pre-determine suitable ROs. This advance preparation enables faster RACH execution without the need for real-time measurement during the critical access phase, thus reducing overall latency while maintaining reliability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The patent applies partial action by performing CLI measurement only for specific ROs that are candidates for full duplex operation, rather than measuring all possible ROs exhaustively. This selective measurement approach reduces the time required for interference assessment while still providing sufficient information to make informed decisions about RO selection.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #16Partial or excessive action

3Productivity

If full duplex RACH is used, then productivity is improved, but harmful factors increase

Engineering Contradiction:
ImproveRACH procedure efficiencyVSAvoidcross-link interference
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSObject-generated harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies local quality by treating different ROs differently based on their interference characteristics. Instead of using a uniform approach for all ROs, the system identifies specific ROs with lower interference levels (based on CLI measurement) and designates them as suitable for full duplex operation, while avoiding full duplex for ROs with high interference. This localized differentiation optimizes productivity where safe and prevents harmful effects where risky.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Solution Approach 2:

The patent applies parameter changes by dynamically adjusting the operational parameters of RACH procedures based on measured interference levels. The system changes the mode of operation (full duplex vs. half duplex) and selects appropriate ROs based on the CLI measurement results, thereby adapting the RACH procedure parameters to balance productivity gains with harmful effect mitigation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Data Source

PatentUS12382506B2Random access channel occasions and resources for interference mitigation
Publication Date: 2025.08.05 QUALCOMM INC
  • US12382506B2 patent drawing
  • US12382506B2 patent drawing
  • US12382506B2 patent drawing

AI summary

Methods, systems, and devices for wireless communication are described. A communication device may receive control signaling indicating a first set of resources for random access channel (RACH) occasions (ROs) and a second set of resources for communicating one or more indications of interference (e.g., crosslink interference (CLI)) associated with the ROs. The communication device may receive a reference signal (e.g., a sounding reference signal (SRS)) over at least one resource of the second set of resources. The communication device may perform a RACH procedure during an RO. The RO may be associated with the at least one resource and may be based on a signal parameter associated with the received reference signal satisfying a threshold (e.g., reference signal strength indicator (RSSI)).