RACH Preamble Sequencing for Uplink Interference Reduction

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

The existing random access channel (RACH) protocols in 3GPP's EUTRA communication system face inefficiencies due to underutilization of reserved resources, leading to wasted transmission resources and interference issues, particularly when handling small to medium amounts of control information and data packets.

Innovation Solution

A hybrid approach using Code Division Multiplexing (CDM) for RACH preamble transmission, combined with time-frequency spreading and Walsh sequences, minimizes interference and eliminates the need for resource reservation, allowing for variable data rates without impacting scheduled users, and utilizing Chu-sequences for optimal autocorrelation and cross-correlation properties.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If Time Division Multiplexing (TDM) is used for RACH multiplexing, then RACH access is organized in reserved slots, but transmission resources are wasted when there are few RACH requests

Engineering Contradiction:
ImproveRACH access organizationVSAvoidtransmission resource waste
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSLoss of energy

Solution Approach 1:

The patent extracts the RACH preamble transmission from reserved time slots and separates it from scheduled data transmission. The base station detects preambles in reserved slots but schedules the actual data transmission dynamically based on actual demand, eliminating the waste of reserved resources when RACH requests are few.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent introduces dynamic scheduling for RACH data transmission. Instead of fixed reserved slots for both preamble and data, the system dynamically allocates resources: preambles are detected in reserved slots, but data transmission is scheduled based on actual RACH request patterns and system load conditions.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

2Reliability

If Frequency Division Multiplexing (FDM) is used for RACH multiplexing, then frequency resources are reserved for RACH access, but system capacity is reduced due to withheld unused resources

Engineering Contradiction:
ImproveRACH access organizationVSAvoidsystem capacity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent extracts RACH data transmission from reserved frequency resources. Only the minimal necessary frequency resources are reserved for preamble detection, while data transmission uses dynamically allocated frequency resources from the general pool, thereby increasing overall system capacity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent implements dynamic frequency resource allocation for RACH data. Instead of statically reserving frequency bands for RACH, the system dynamically assigns frequency resources based on actual RACH traffic patterns, allowing unused frequency resources to be utilized for other purposes.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

3Adaptability or versatility

If Code Division Multiplexing (CDM) is used for RACH transmission, then no resource reservation is needed, but interference is generated to other uplink users

Engineering Contradiction:
ImproveRACH access flexibilityVSAvoiduplink interference
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSObject-generated harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The patent extracts the interference problem by separating preamble detection (using CDM in reserved slots) from data transmission (using scheduled resources). The CDM preambles are confined to specific reserved time-frequency resources, limiting their interference scope, while data transmission uses orthogonal scheduled resources.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent dynamically controls CDM usage. Instead of continuous CDM transmission that causes ongoing interference, the system uses CDM only for brief preamble detection in reserved slots, then transitions to scheduled orthogonal transmission for data, reducing overall interference.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

4Reliability

If reserved RACH resources are allocated, then RACH access is guaranteed, but detection error rates and false alarms increase due to resource underutilization

Engineering Contradiction:
ImproveRACH access guaranteeVSAvoiddetection accuracy
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSMeasurement precision

Solution Approach 1:

The patent implements feedback mechanisms where the base station monitors RACH preamble detection results and adjusts scheduling decisions accordingly. Detection accuracy is improved by using the feedback from preamble detection to make informed scheduling decisions, reducing false alarms and detection errors.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Solution Approach 2:

The patent dynamically adjusts resource allocation based on actual RACH traffic. When RACH requests are frequent, reserved resources are fully utilized; when requests are rare, resources are released for other uses. This dynamic adaptation improves detection accuracy by matching resource availability with actual demand patterns.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Data Source

PatentUS8000305B2Preamble sequencing for random access channel in a communication system
Publication Date: 2011.08.16 GOOGLE TECHNOLOGY HOLDINGS LLC
  • US8000305B2 patent drawing
  • US8000305B2 patent drawing
  • US8000305B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A system and method for initializing a system communication without previous reservations for random access channel (RACH) access includes a first step of defining at least one spread sequence derived from at least one constant amplitude zero autocorrelation sequence. A next step includes combining the spread sequence with a Walsh code to form an extended spread sequence. A next step includes using the extended spread sequence in a preamble for a RACH. A next step includes sending the preamble to a BTS for acquisition. A next step includes monitoring for a positive acquisition indicator from the BTS. A next step includes scheduling the sending of a RACH message. A next step includes sending the RACH message.