Rack Cable Management via Guide Channels for FRU Service

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing cable management systems in storage racks are complex, leading to increased costs, reduced airflow, and operational performance issues due to their complexity and the need for longer cables, which fold and overlap, obstructing airflow.

Innovation Solution

A cable management apparatus that limits the travel of field replaceable units (FRUs) out of the rack, allowing for shorter cables and improved airflow by using non-overlapping, pivotally and slidably attached arms to manage cables, ensuring they remain non-folded and non-overlapping even when the FRU is fully inserted.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Ease of operation

If existing cable management arms are used to allow FRU movement, then cable management is achieved, but device complexity increases and manufacturing cost increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecable managementVSAvoidcable management system complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent extracts the cable management function from complex articulating arms and implements it through simple guide channels formed in the rack structure itself. The guide channels passively guide cables along the FRU's movement path without requiring active articulating mechanisms, thereby eliminating complexity while maintaining ease of operation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent introduces cable guide channels as intermediary structures that mediate between the moving FRU and the stationary rack. These channels provide a structured path for cables, allowing smooth transitions during FRU insertion and removal without requiring complex cable management arms.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

2Ease of operation

If existing cable management arms are used to allow FRU movement, then cable management is achieved, but manufacturing cost increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecable managementVSAvoidmanufacturing cost
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSEase of manufacture

Solution Approach 1:

The patent removes the need for expensive articulating cable management arms by extracting the essential function to simple guide channels. This dramatically reduces manufacturing costs while maintaining the ability to manage cables during FRU movement.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent changes the approach from active mechanical arms to passive structural channels, fundamentally altering the implementation parameters. This simplification reduces manufacturing complexity and cost while achieving the same operational benefit.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Ease of operation

If longer cables are used to accommodate FRU movement, then cable connectivity is maintained, but airflow through the rack is reduced

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecable connectivityVSAvoidairflow obstruction
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSObject-affected harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The patent segments the cable path into controlled sections defined by the guide channels. Cables are routed through specific channels that keep them organized and minimize their spatial occupation, reducing airflow obstruction while maintaining connectivity during FRU movement.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The patent utilizes three-dimensional space efficiently by routing cables through vertically oriented guide channels and along the sides of the rack. This dimensional arrangement keeps cables out of the horizontal airflow path, maintaining both connectivity and airflow performance.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #17Another dimension (Dimensionality change)

4Ease of operation

If cables are allowed to fold and overlap during FRU movement, then cable flexibility is achieved, but airflow obstruction increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecable flexibilityVSAvoidairflow obstruction
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSObject-affected harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The patent divides the cable routing into discrete segments defined by guide channels at different locations. This segmentation prevents cables from folding and overlapping by providing separate, organized paths for cable traversal, maintaining flexibility while eliminating airflow obstruction.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The patent converts the potential harm of cable movement during FRU insertion into a benefit by using the movement itself to advance cables through pre-positioned guide channels. This ensures cables remain organized and non-obstructive throughout the movement process.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #22Blessing in disguise (Convert harm into benefit)

Data Source

PatentUS20170273211A1Cable management for rack-mounted computing devices
Publication Date: 2017.09.21 ORACLE INT CORP
  • US20170273211A1 patent drawing
  • US20170273211A1 patent drawing
  • US20170273211A1 patent drawing

AI summary

A cable management apparatus that limits the degree of travel of a FRU (e.g., server, other computing device, power supply, etc.) out of a storage rack to an amount just necessary to service one or more particular components of the FRU (e.g., fan bay, etc.) free of having to power down the FRU which provides a more cost effective maintenance strategy for users. As a result, the disclosed cable management apparatus advantageously allows for the use of shorter cables between the FRU and other devices (e.g., other FRUs, switches, power supplies, etc.), improved airflow through the FRUs and the storage rack, reduced complexity of the cable management apparatus, simplified installation and manipulation of the apparatus, and the like.