Rack-Climbing Shuttle Layout for Scalable Aisle-Crossing Retrieval

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Modern material handling systems in warehouses and distribution centers face inefficiencies as they scale, leading to increased costs and complexity, with the point of diminishing returns making incremental expansions cost-prohibitive, prompting the need for new automation infrastructure.

Innovation Solution

A method and system for delivering and retrieving items using a network of storage racks and vehicles equipped with horizontal and vertical drive systems, allowing vehicles to navigate and interact with tracks and storage locations efficiently, enabling flexible path changes and orientation adjustments to optimize storage and retrieval operations.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Productivity

If incremental expansion of existing automation infrastructure is pursued, then capacity and functionality are improved, but cost and complexity increase to the point of diminishing returns

Engineering Contradiction:
ImprovecapacityVSAvoidcomplexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system is divided into modular components: multiple independent vehicles, discrete storage locations, and separable track segments. Each vehicle operates autonomously within the rack structure, allowing the system to scale by adding individual units rather than overhauling entire subsystems. This modularity enables incremental capacity expansion without proportionally increasing overall system complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The vehicle positioning system dynamically adjusts vehicle locations along the track based on real-time storage and retrieval demands. Vehicles can move horizontally along tracks and vertically between levels, providing flexible adaptation to changing operational requirements. This dynamic reconfigurability allows the system to optimize capacity utilization without requiring fixed, overly complex infrastructure.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

2Productivity

If existing automation infrastructure is expanded incrementally, then throughput is improved temporarily, but response time increases and backlog accumulates

Engineering Contradiction:
ImprovethroughputVSAvoidresponse time
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

Multiple vehicles operate simultaneously and independently within the rack system, enabling continuous storage and retrieval operations without sequential bottlenecks. While one vehicle serves a storage location, others can concurrently serve different locations, maintaining continuous productive action. This parallel operation sustains high throughput response times even as system capacity expands.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #20Continuity of useful action

Solution Approach 2:

Each vehicle is equipped with its own drive system and control capabilities, allowing autonomous navigation to required positions and independent execution of storage/retrieval tasks. Vehicles self-coordinate their movements and operations without requiring centralized sequential control, reducing response time delays and preventing task backlogs through decentralized autonomous operation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

3Productivity

If new automation infrastructure is deployed to replace existing systems, then efficiency is improved, but cost becomes prohibitive

Engineering Contradiction:
ImproveefficiencyVSAvoidcost
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSEase of manufacture

Solution Approach 1:

The vehicle design incorporates universal features that enable multiple functions: horizontal track navigation, vertical level transitions, item retrieval, and repositioning capabilities. This multi-functionality consolidates what would otherwise require separate specialized systems into a single versatile platform, reducing overall infrastructure costs while maintaining high operational efficiency.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Solution Approach 2:

Vehicles nest within the rack structure, with horizontal tracks integrated into vertical rack frameworks. The vehicle dimensions are designed to fit within column openings, and vertical drive mechanisms nest within vehicle bodies. This nested configuration maximizes space utilization and eliminates the need for separate support structures, significantly reducing infrastructure costs compared to conventional automated storage systems.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #7Nested doll (Nesting)

Data Source

PatentUS11472632B2Material handling system
Publication Date: 2022.10.18 OPEX CORP
  • US11472632B2 patent drawing
  • US11472632B2 patent drawing
  • US11472632B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A system may include a vehicle for delivering items and a plurality of racks having a plurality of storage locations. The racks may be arranged to form one or more aisles. The vehicles are configured to drive horizontally along a path that may extend along a path under the racks that is parallel to the aisles. Additionally, the vehicles may be operated to turn while the vehicle is positioned under one of the racks. The vehicles may travel under the racks and cross one or more aisles to reach a particular column in one of the aisles. The vehicle climbs upwardly within the particular column to retrieve an item from a storage location in the column.