Rack Interlock System Limits Sled Extension for Stability

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

In systems with multiple rack-mounted devices, the partial insertion of chassis can create a tipping moment that may cause the rack to topple, especially during service or seismic events, as each chassis can be cantilevered and contribute to the overall instability.

Innovation Solution

A rack interlock system equipped with sensors and a controller that monitors the number of extended sleds and activates a locking mechanism to prevent excessive tipping by locking remaining sleds in place once a predetermined number is extended, thereby maintaining rack stability.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Productivity

If multiple sleds are extended simultaneously for hardware transfer, then productivity is improved, but the rack stability deteriorates due to increased tipping moment

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvehardware transfer efficiencyVSAvoidrack stability
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSStability of the object's composition

Solution Approach 1:

The system uses sensors to detect the position of each sled and provides feedback to the controller. The controller monitors the number of extended sleds and automatically activates the locking mechanism when the predetermined limit is reached, creating a closed-loop control system that prevents tipping while allowing efficient hardware transfer

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Solution Approach 2:

The locking mechanism acts as an intermediary between the sleds and the rack structure. It selectively restricts the movement of non-extended sleds while allowing extended sleds to remain accessible, mediating between the need for stability and the need for productivity

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

2Stability of the object's composition

If a locking mechanism is implemented to prevent tipping, then rack stability is improved, but device complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improverack stabilityVSAvoidinterlock system complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Stability of the object's compositionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system is designed to be self-regulating through automatic sensor detection and controller activation. Once a predetermined number of sleds are extended, the locking mechanism automatically engages without requiring manual intervention, and automatically releases when sleds are retracted, making the system self-service and reducing operational complexity

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Solution Approach 2:

The patent replaces purely mechanical interlocking systems with an integrated sensor-controller-actuator system. This substitution allows for more precise control and monitoring while maintaining relatively simple mechanical locking components, reducing overall system complexity through intelligent control

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

Data Source

PatentUS12004319B1Rack interlock limiting the withdrawal of chassis
Publication Date: 2024.06.04 AMD DESIGN LLC
  • US12004319B1 patent drawing
  • US12004319B1 patent drawing
  • US12004319B1 patent drawing

AI summary

A system and method are provided for an interlock that limits the number of electronic devices that may extend from a rack system. In the system, sensors attached to the rack detect the extension of a rail from the rack. The sensors provide a controller with data from which the controller determines a number of rails that are extended from the rack. If the number of extended rails is determined by the controller to exceed a threshold number, the controller actuates a latch system that closes to lock the remaining devices within the rack.