Rack-Mounted Modular Redundancy With Standby Switchover

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Rack-mounting systems lack redundancy, leading to system failures when common functional elements fail, resulting in downtime, especially in critical applications like satellite communications where continuous operation is essential.

Innovation Solution

A rack-mounting system design where each shelf can accommodate multiple self-contained, fully operational modular components of reduced width, with switchover mechanisms to seamlessly replace failed components, ensuring continuous operation and increasing Mean Time Between Failures (MTBF).

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Device complexity

If modular components share common functional elements (e.g., power supply) to reduce device complexity, then device complexity is reduced, but reliability deteriorates because failure of one common element causes entire system failure

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesystem complexityVSAvoidsystem reliability
Core Design Contradiction:
Device complexityVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The system is divided into independent modular components, each with its own dedicated power supply and functional elements. This segmentation isolates failures to individual modules rather than affecting the entire system, resolving the contradiction by maintaining low overall complexity through standardization while achieving high reliability through independence of critical subsystems.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

Different parts of the system have different organizational structures: common structural elements (rack frame, mounting rails) are shared to reduce complexity, while critical functional elements (power supplies, signal processing) are locally independent to ensure reliability. This local differentiation resolves the contradiction between system-wide simplicity and component-level independence.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

2Reliability

If standby redundant components are kept ready for immediate replacement, then reliability is improved, but device complexity increases due to additional components and switchover mechanisms

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesystem redundancyVSAvoidredundancy management complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

Standby redundant components are pre-configured and pre-tested in the same rack structure, with all necessary connections and mounting positions prepared in advance. This preliminary preparation allows immediate switchover upon failure without requiring complex real-time decision-making or reconfiguration, thus achieving high reliability while keeping the switchover mechanism simple.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The rack structure and mounting mechanisms are designed to be universal, accommodating both active and standby components using the same interfaces and mounting hardware. This universality allows the system to handle redundancy management through standard procedures rather than specialized complex mechanisms, resolving the contradiction between having standby components and maintaining simplicity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

3Loss of time

If rapid switchover to standby components is implemented, then downtime is reduced, but ease of operation deteriorates due to complex switchover procedures

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesystem downtimeVSAvoidcomponent replacement simplicity
Core Design Contradiction:
Loss of timeVSEase of operation

Solution Approach 1:

All switchover requirements are prepared in advance: standby components are pre-positioned in the rack, pre-connected to necessary systems, and pre-configured with correct settings. When failure occurs, the operator simply needs to activate the pre-prepared standby component rather than performing complex real-time setup procedures, thus achieving rapid switchover while maintaining operational simplicity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The redundant components are designed to be self-contained with self-diagnostic capabilities that automatically detect failures and initiate switchover procedures. This self-service approach eliminates the need for complex manual intervention, achieving both rapid response time and operational simplicity by automating the switchover process.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Data Source

PatentUS7510090B2Rack-mounting system for improving redundancy
Publication Date: 2009.03.31 NARDA HOLDINGS INC
  • US7510090B2 patent drawing
  • US7510090B2 patent drawing
  • US7510090B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A rack-mounting system includes a rack with a number of shelves for mounting electronic modular components. At least two modular components are mounted on each shelf, each component with width approximately equal to W/n, where W equals the width of the shelf and n equals the maximum number of modular components to be mounted on a single shelf. Each modular component is fully self-contained, stand-alone, and operates with full independence of the other self-contained, stand-alone components. At least two modular components have the same function. Means is provided for switching out a defective component and switching in a standby component that performs the same function, thus enhancing redundancy.