Rack and Roller Pinion Lift System for Quiet Passenger Elevators

Solution Overview

Problem

Rack and gear elevators suffer from noise issues and poor ride comfort, making them unsuitable for non-industrial applications despite offering space efficiency and reduced infrastructure needs.

Innovation Solution

A rack and roller pinion lift system with parallel elongated racks, a drive unit, and a speed limiter, featuring roller pinions that minimize friction and provide mechanical advantage, along with a design that includes rounded teeth for reduced noise and increased strength, allowing for easier operation with minimal power requirements.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Area of stationary object

If a rack and gear system is used for elevation, then space efficiency is improved and infrastructure needs are reduced, but noise increases and ride comfort deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Core Design Contradiction:
Area of stationary objectVSObject-affected harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The patent replaces the traditional gear teeth engagement mechanism with a roller pinion system that rolls along the rack. This substitution transforms the sliding friction and impact-based mechanical interaction into a rolling contact system, significantly reducing noise generation while maintaining the compact space-efficient design of rack-based elevation systems

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

Solution Approach 2:

The roller pinion system employs periodic engagement and disengagement with the rack through a series of discrete rollers spaced along the pinion circumference. This periodic rolling contact creates smoother, quieter operation compared to continuous gear tooth sliding, as each roller makes brief contact and then rolls away, reducing impact noise and vibration

Inventive Principle:
Principle #19Periodic action

2Area of stationary object

If a rack and gear system is used for elevation, then space efficiency is improved, but ride comfort deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Core Design Contradiction:
Area of stationary objectVSObject-affected harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The patent replaces the traditional gear teeth engagement mechanism with a roller pinion system that rolls along the rack. This substitution transforms the sliding friction and impact-based mechanical interaction into a rolling contact system, significantly reducing noise generation while maintaining the compact space-efficient design of rack-based elevation systems

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

Solution Approach 2:

The roller pinion system employs periodic engagement and disengagement with the rack through a series of discrete rollers spaced along the pinion circumference. This periodic rolling contact creates smoother, quieter operation compared to continuous gear tooth sliding, as each roller makes brief contact and then rolls away, reducing impact noise and vibration

Inventive Principle:
Principle #19Periodic action

3Loss of energy

If roller pinions are used instead of gear teeth, then friction is minimized and mechanical advantage is improved, but device complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Core Design Contradiction:
Loss of energyVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The pinion is segmented into multiple discrete rollers spaced around its circumference rather than using a single continuous gear structure. Each roller independently contacts the rack, distributing the mechanical load and reducing friction through rolling contact. This segmentation simplifies the manufacturing of individual roller components while achieving superior mechanical efficiency

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The rollers act as intermediary elements between the pinion shaft and the rack. Instead of direct gear tooth engagement, the rollers mediate the force transmission by rolling along the rack surface, reducing friction and wear while maintaining mechanical advantage. This intermediary rolling contact simplifies the interaction mechanism compared to complex gear tooth geometry

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

The system reduces noise and enhances ride comfort, enabling its use in non-industrial settings while maintaining space efficiency and lowering power requirements, thus making it suitable for applications like passenger elevators.

Implementation Method 1

Roller pinions are provided to smooth the action and minimize friction

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectFriction: Friction

Implementation Method 2

provide mechanical advantage for easy operation with minimal power requirements

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectMechanical Advantage: Mechanical Advantage

Implementation Method 3

The speed limiter interacts with the rack to produce a slow descent

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectFriction: Friction

Data Source

PatentUS10017359B2Rack and roller pinion lift system
Publication Date: 2018.07.10
  • US10017359B2 patent drawing
  • US10017359B2 patent drawing
  • US10017359B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A lift system comprising an elongated rack and a roller pinion drive system. A preferred version has two parallel rack with plurality of rungs extending horizontally between the racks to form a ladder. A plurality of spaced apart mounting brackets are configured for affixing the ladder vertically to a stationary member, the stationary member not forming part of the invention. In this version, a drive unit retained within a carriage is mounted in proximity to the racks. The drive unit interacts with the racks to move the carriage upwardly and downwardly along the racks. A speed limiter is also disclosed that can be retained within the carriage below the drive unit and mounted in proximity to one of the racks. The speed limiter interacts with the rack to produce a breaking action if the drive unit fails, preventing the carriage to drop down quickly. Single rack and inclined rack versions are disclosed as alternatives.