Rack Slide Rail Support Structure for Stable Chassis Mounting

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing slide rail assemblies for rack systems do not effectively support devices of varying shapes, as they lack a direct contact mechanism to securely hold the upper part of the chassis, limiting their adaptability and stability.

Innovation Solution

A slide rail assembly comprising a rack with first and second posts, where each slide rail assembly includes a support rail with a supporting part that directly contacts the bottom surface of the chassis, enhancing the contact area and stability by extending from the upper edge of the lower part's sides, allowing for secure engagement and adjustment.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If traditional slide rail assemblies are used without a direct contact supporting part, then the structure remains simple, but the stability and adaptability for devices of different shapes deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
ImprovestabilityVSAvoidstructure complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The support rail is divided into distinct functional segments: a supporting part that directly contacts the chassis bottom surface, a connecting part that joins to the slide rail, and positioning features. This segmentation allows each part to perform its specific function optimally while maintaining overall structural integrity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The supporting part acts as an intermediary element between the slide rail assembly and the chassis upper part. It provides direct contact and support where traditional designs had gaps, enabling stable support for various chassis shapes without requiring complex adaptive mechanisms.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

2Adaptability or versatility

If a support rail with supporting part is added to directly contact the chassis, then the adaptability and stability improve, but the device complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
ImproveadaptabilityVSAvoidstructure complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The support rail assembly serves multiple functions: it provides direct supporting contact for the chassis upper part, enables sliding movement along the slide rail, offers positioning through engagement features, and adapts to various chassis configurations. This multi-functionality achieves high adaptability without requiring multiple separate components.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Solution Approach 2:

The connection between the support rail and slide rail incorporates movable elements that allow the assembly to adapt dynamically to different chassis shapes and positions. The engaging parts can adjust their configuration while maintaining stable support, providing versatility without fixed complex structures.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

3Area of stationary object

If the supporting part directly contacts the bottom surface of the upper part, then the contact area increases and stability improves, but the manufacturing complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecontact areaVSAvoidmanufacturing complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Area of stationary objectVSEase of manufacture

Solution Approach 1:

The supporting part features localized contact surfaces with specific geometric properties optimized for direct contact with the chassis bottom surface. These local quality enhancements are concentrated only where needed for support, rather than requiring complex features throughout the entire component, simplifying manufacturing.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Solution Approach 2:

The supporting part's contact surface parameters (area, orientation, curvature) are specifically designed to maximize contact with various chassis bottom surfaces. By optimizing these parameters within standard manufacturing capabilities, the design achieves large effective contact area without excessive manufacturing complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

4Manufacturing precision

If the bottom surface is extended and bent relative to the upper edge, then the engagement precision and adjustment capability improve, but the manufacturing precision requirements increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveengagement precisionVSAvoidmanufacturing precision requirements
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSEase of manufacture

Solution Approach 1:

The supporting part is pre-configured with the extended and bent bottom surface geometry during manufacturing. This preliminary action ensures that the precise engagement features are built-in, allowing for high engagement precision during assembly without requiring complex real-time adjustments or post-processing.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The bottom surface geometry parameters (extension length, bend angle, curvature) are carefully selected to achieve the desired engagement precision while remaining within standard manufacturing tolerances. This balances the need for precise engagement with practical manufacturability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Data Source

PatentEP3157314B1Slide rail assembly for rack system
Publication Date: 2019.04.24 KING SLIDE WORKS CO LTD
  • EP3157314B1 patent drawingFigure 1
  • EP3157314B1 patent drawingFigure 2
  • EP3157314B1 patent drawingFigure 3

AI summary

A rack system (10) includes a rack (12), a slide rail assembly (14, 16) and a chassis (18). The slide rail assembly (14, 16) is mounted to the rack (12). The chassis (18) includes an upper part (26) and a lower part (28). The upper part (26) has an upper part width, and the lower part (28) has a lower part width narrower than the upper part width. Wherein, the lower part (28) is engaged with the slide rail assembly (14, 16).