C-Shaped Tie Support Structure for Rack Beam Sag and Twist

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing ready-to-assemble rack storage systems fail to prevent bowing, sagging, or outward twisting of deck beams under significant weight, leading to instability and potential collapse.

Innovation Solution

The storage rack employs a C-shaped tie support arrangement with interlocking tabs and slots between deck beams, which limits sagging and prevents twisting, and an optional reinforcing rib for increased rigidity, ensuring stability under heavy loads.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If traditional deck beam support arrangements are used, then the structure is simple and easy to assemble, but the deck beams bow, sag, or twist under significant weight leading to instability

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvestructural stabilityVSAvoidsupport arrangement complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The tie support is divided into multiple functional segments: top flange with tabs for preventing upward twisting, bottom flange with tabs for preventing downward twisting, and vertical web for preventing sagging. Each segment addresses a specific failure mode, allowing the overall structure to maintain stability without requiring a completely complex design.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The tie support extends in multiple dimensions - horizontally between deck beams and vertically with its web. The tabs extend perpendicular to the main flange surfaces, adding another dimensional aspect to the restraint mechanism. This multi-dimensional approach prevents deformation in multiple directions simultaneously.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #17Another dimension (Dimensionality change)

2Strength

If heavier gauge steel is used for deck beams, then sagging and twisting are prevented, but manufacturing cost and weight increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveresistance to sagging and twistingVSAvoiddeck beam weight
Core Design Contradiction:
StrengthVSWeight of stationary object

Solution Approach 1:

The tie support acts as an intermediary element between the deck beams, providing the necessary reinforcement without requiring the deck beams themselves to be heavier. The tie support transfers and distributes loads, allowing lighter deck beams to achieve the same structural performance as heavier ones would provide alone.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

Solution Approach 2:

The system combines the deck beam structure with the tie support structure to create a composite load-bearing system. The tie support's C-shaped configuration with flanges and web creates a composite structural arrangement that provides enhanced strength and rigidity without requiring the primary deck beams to be made of heavier material.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #40Composite materials

3Reliability

If tie supports are added to prevent sagging and twisting, then structural integrity is improved, but assembly complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvestructural integrityVSAvoidassembly ease
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSEase of operation

Solution Approach 1:

The critical reinforcement functions are extracted into separate, standardized tie support components that can be manufactured independently and then assembled. This allows the complex structural reinforcement to be achieved through modular components rather than requiring complex integrated structures, making assembly more manageable.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

Solution Approach 2:

The tie support design uses standardized dimensional parameters and material specifications that optimize both structural performance and manufacturability. The C-shaped configuration with specific flange widths, web thickness, and tab dimensions represents optimized parameters that provide maximum structural benefit with minimal assembly complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Data Source

PatentUS9215926B1Storage rack with improved tie support
Publication Date: 2015.12.22 LIVING STYLE B V I LTD
  • US9215926B1 patent drawing
  • US9215926B1 patent drawing
  • US9215926B1 patent drawing

AI summary

A storage rack includes front and rear deck beams and C-shaped tie supports extending between the deck beams. Each tie support has a side wall, a top flange and a bottom flange. The top flange and bottom flange have front and rear ends and tabs extending downwardly therefrom. The top flange has a reinforcing rib. When assembled with the deck beams the front and rear ends of the top flange are seated on a support ledge of the deck beams with the tabs received into respective slots. Similarly, the front and rear ends of the bottom flange are seated on a lower leg of the front and rear deck beams with the tabs received into respective slots. The tie supports cooperate with the deck beams to limit the sagging of the decks, while also preventing outward twisting of the deck beams.