Tennis Racket Frame Stiffness Optimization for Repulsion and Control

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Tennis players require rackets that balance high repulsion performance with high controllability, a demand not fully met by existing rackets.

Innovation Solution

A racket design featuring a frame with a maximum thickness less than 26.0 mm, an in-plane stiffness index (Gi) between 5000 and 8000, and an out-of-plane stiffness index (Go) between 45000 and 60000, achieved through the use of fiber reinforced layers with bias-type and straight-type reinforcement fibers.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Speed

If the frame thickness is increased to improve repulsion performance, then the ball can fly at higher velocity, but the controllability deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveball velocityVSAvoidcontrollability
Core Design Contradiction:
SpeedVSEase of operation

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies parameter changes by precisely controlling the frame thickness within the range of 18.0 mm to 25.0 mm and optimizing the stiffness indices (Gi: 5000-8000, Go: 45000-60000). This parameter optimization allows the frame to be thick enough for repulsion performance while thin enough to maintain controllability, resolving the contradiction between ball velocity and controllability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Solution Approach 2:

The patent employs composite materials by combining fiber reinforced layers with bias-type and straight-type reinforcement fibers in specific configurations. This composite structure enables the frame to achieve both sufficient stiffness for repulsion and appropriate flexibility for controllability, allowing simultaneous optimization of ball velocity and player control.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #40Composite materials

2Speed

If the in-plane stiffness is increased to improve repulsion performance, then the ball can fly at higher velocity, but the contact time with the ball decreases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveball velocityVSAvoidcontact time
Core Design Contradiction:
SpeedVSDuration of action of moving object

Solution Approach 1:

The patent optimizes the in-plane stiffness index Gi to fall within the specific range of 5000 to 8000. This controlled parameter range ensures the frame provides sufficient repulsion force for high ball velocity while maintaining adequate contact time with the ball, preventing the stiffness from being so high that contact time is excessively reduced.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Solution Approach 2:

The patent applies local quality by using bias-type reinforcement fibers in specific regions of the frame where repulsion performance is most critical, while using straight-type reinforcement fibers in other regions. This localized fiber placement optimizes the stiffness distribution across the frame, ensuring high repulsion performance where needed while maintaining appropriate contact time characteristics.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

3Strength

If the frame thickness is increased to improve structural strength, then the repulsion performance improves, but the manufacturing complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveframe strengthVSAvoidmanufacturing complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
StrengthVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent uses composite materials with fiber reinforced layers to achieve high frame strength without excessive thickness. The fiber reinforcement provides structural strength while maintaining a manageable thickness range (18.0-25.0 mm), simplifying the manufacturing process compared to using thicker frames made from homogeneous materials.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #40Composite materials

Solution Approach 2:

The patent specifies precise parameter ranges for frame thickness (18.0-25.0 mm) and stiffness indices (Gi: 5000-8000, Go: 45000-60000). These controlled parameters ensure the frame achieves necessary strength while remaining within manufacturable thickness limits, avoiding the need for overly complex manufacturing processes that would be required for much thicker frames.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Data Source

PatentUS20250135309A1racket
Publication Date: 2025.05.01 SUMITOMO RUBBER INDUSTRIES LTD
  • US20250135309A1 patent drawing
  • US20250135309A1 patent drawing
  • US20250135309A1 patent drawing

AI summary

A racket 2 includes a frame 4, a grip 6, a grommet 10, and a string 12. The frame 4 includes a head 14, a first throat 16a, a second throat 16b, and a shaft 18. A maximum value of a thickness of the frame 4 is less than 26.0 mm. The racket 2 has an in-plane stiffness index Gi of greater than or equal to 5000 and less than or equal to 8000. The in-plane stiffness index Gi is a product of a top pressure stiffness value Git (kgf/cm) and a side pressure stiffness value Gis (kgf/cm). The racket 2 has an out-of-plane stiffness index Go of greater than or equal to 45000 and less than or equal to 60000. The out-of-plane stiffness index Go is a product of a throat stiffness value Gos (kgf/cm) and a ball-hitting face stiffness value Goh (kgf/cm).