Radar Angular Position Evaluation Using Speed-Based Search Regions

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current radar systems face significant computing expenses and energy consumption when determining angular positions of objects, especially in large angular regions and high object resolution, making the detection of weaker targets inefficient.

Innovation Solution

A method and device that first assess the intrinsic speed of the radar device and relative speed of objects to identify potential stationary targets, reducing the search space to a narrower angular region, and using an angular quality measure to determine if the object is within a pre-defined test region, thereby reducing computational effort and energy consumption.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Measurement precision

If conventional radar methods are used to determine angular positions with high object resolution in large angular regions, then detection accuracy is improved, but computing expense and energy consumption increase significantly

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveangular position determination accuracyVSAvoidcomputing energy consumption
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSUse of energy by moving object

Solution Approach 1:

The patent divides the angular search space into multiple angular test regions based on the relative speed of the recognized object. Instead of performing exhaustive angular estimation across the entire angular range, the method segments the search space and only performs detailed angular estimation within the relevant test region(s), thereby reducing computing expense and energy consumption while maintaining detection accuracy for objects in the regions of interest.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

2Reliability

If exhaustive angular estimation is performed across all angular regions, then complete object detection is achieved, but processing time increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveobject detection completenessVSAvoidangular estimation processing time
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The patent performs preliminary classification of objects as stationary or moving based on their relative speed before performing angular estimation. By determining the object category in advance and calculating angular test regions based on relative speed, the method prepares the search space beforehand, allowing angular estimation to be performed only where necessary. This preliminary action reduces processing time while maintaining detection completeness.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

3Productivity

If the search space is reduced to narrow angular regions, then computing expense is reduced, but detection of objects outside expected regions may be missed

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecomputational efficiencyVSAvoidobject detection coverage
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The patent dynamically adjusts the angular test regions based on the relative speed of the recognized object. The angular test regions are not fixed but are calculated adaptively according to the object's motion characteristics. This dynamic approach ensures that the search regions accurately reflect the expected angular positions of objects with different relative speeds, maintaining detection coverage while optimizing computational efficiency.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Data Source

PatentUS11698451B2Method and device for evaluating the angular position of an object, and driver assistance system
Publication Date: 2023.07.11 ROBERT BOSCH GMBH
  • US11698451B2 patent drawing
  • US11698451B2 patent drawing
  • US11698451B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A method for evaluating an angular position of an object recognized on the basis of radar data, the radar data being ascertained by a radar device. The method includes: ascertaining of an intrinsic speed of the radar device; ascertaining a relative speed of the recognized object in relation to the radar device, using the ascertained radar data; ascertaining at least one angular test region using the ascertained intrinsic speed and the ascertained relative speed, the at least one angular test region corresponding to possible stationary objects that have a relative speed that substantially corresponds to the ascertained relative speed; and ascertaining whether an azimuth angle of the recognized object lies in the ascertained angular test region.