Airport Surveillance Radar Blind Spot Mitigation

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Radar systems face significant blind spots due to terrain obstruction, Earth curvature, and interference from wind farms, which degrade their performance and make it difficult to distinguish aircraft from false targets created by rotating wind turbines.

Innovation Solution

A system that merges data from a gap filler radar with an airport surveillance radar, using a phased array radar to illuminate blind spots and employing target classification techniques to differentiate between aircraft and wind farm interference, ensuring accurate altitude estimation and radial velocity analysis to suppress false targets.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If airport surveillance radar is used to monitor aircraft, then aircraft detection capability is improved, but blind spots are created due to terrain obstruction, Earth curvature, and wind farm interference

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveaircraft detection capabilityVSAvoidblind spots
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSObject-affected harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The surveillance system is divided into multiple independent radar components: a primary airport surveillance radar for general monitoring and a specialized gap filler radar specifically designed to illuminate blind spot regions. This segmentation allows each radar to be optimized for its specific function while collectively providing complete coverage.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

A gap filler radar acts as an intermediary system between the primary radar and the blind spot regions. This intermediate radar provides the missing coverage by illuminating areas that the primary radar cannot reach due to terrain, curvature, or wind farm interference, effectively mediating the detection gap.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

2Area of stationary object

If radar illuminates areas with wind farms, then coverage is improved, but false targets are generated by rotating wind turbines that cannot be distinguished from aircraft

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveradar coverage areaVSAvoidfalse targets
Core Design Contradiction:
Area of stationary objectVSObject-generated harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

Target classification is performed before tracking to preliminarily identify and filter out false targets from wind farms. By classifying detected objects based on their characteristics (such as radial velocity, amplitude, and spatial distribution) before initiating tracking, the system prevents false targets from being processed as valid aircraft detections.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The system uses feedback from target classification results to adjust tracking decisions. Classified information about detected objects (whether they are likely aircraft or wind farm interference) is fed back into the tracking algorithm, allowing the system to suppress tracking of false targets while maintaining tracking of genuine aircraft.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

3Reliability

If target classification is performed before tracking, then false target suppression is improved, but system complexity increases due to additional processing requirements

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvefalse target suppressionVSAvoidprocessing system complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

Different classification techniques are applied to different types of detections based on their characteristics. Rather than using a single complex classification system for all targets, the system applies appropriate classification methods locally to each detection type (e.g., using radial velocity analysis for ground-based interference like wind farms, and different methods for aerial targets), simplifying the overall system while maintaining effectiveness.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

The system effectively mitigates blind spots by classifying targets before tracking, reducing false alarms and maintaining accurate aircraft tracking over cluttered areas, thereby enhancing radar performance and reliability.

Implementation Method 1

A system that merges data from a gap filler radar with an airport surveillance radar, using a phased array radar to illuminate blind spots

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectRadar: Radar

Implementation Method 2

employing target classification techniques to differentiate between aircraft and wind farm interference, ensuring accurate altitude estimation and radial velocity analysis

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectDoppler effect: Doppler Effect

Data Source

PatentEP2419755B1Methods and apparatus for integration of distributed sensors and airport surveillance radar to mitigate blind spots
Publication Date: 2017.05.24 RAYTHEON CO
  • EP2419755B1 patent drawingFigure 1
  • EP2419755B1 patent drawingFigure 2
  • EP2419755B1 patent drawingFigure 3

AI summary

Methods and apparatus for a first radar; identifying a blind spot in coverage of the first radar; providing a second radar to illuminate the blind spot, and merging data from the first and second radars using target classification prior to tracking to reduce false targets. In one embodiment, polarimetric data is used to classify targets.