Linear Chirp Radar Detection via Signal Correlation

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing solutions for detecting linear chirped radar signals in Orthogonal Frequency Division Multiple Access (OFDMA) systems are inefficient, requiring multiple Fast Fourier Transforms (FFTs) and complex multiplications, which increases processing complexity and may lead to false alarms due to interference from WiFi traffic.

Innovation Solution

A tunable detector method that divides signal samples into two groups and performs correlation between them to generate a resultant group, identifying a peak value in the frequency domain to determine the presence of a linear chirp, thereby reducing processing complexity and improving detection accuracy.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If multiple Fast Fourier Transforms (FFTs) and complex multiplications are used for detecting linear chirped radar signals, then detection capability is achieved, but processing complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveradar signal detection capabilityVSAvoidprocessing complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent divides the received signal into multiple segments and performs correlation detection on each segment separately. This segmentation approach reduces the computational burden of processing the entire signal at once, while maintaining detection capability through cumulative analysis of segment results

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The patent extracts the correlation function of the chirp signal and identifies peak values in the frequency domain to detect radar signals. This extraction method isolates the essential detection feature (correlation peak) from the complete signal processing chain, reducing unnecessary computational steps

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

2Measurement precision

If multiple Fast Fourier Transforms (FFTs) are used for frequency domain analysis, then detection accuracy is improved, but computational complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedetection accuracyVSAvoidcomputational complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent performs correlation detection in the time domain and then transforms only the correlation results to the frequency domain using a single FFT, rather than performing multiple FFTs on the original signal. This extraction and selective transformation approach maintains detection accuracy while significantly reducing computational complexity

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent performs correlation operation before the frequency domain transformation, which simplifies the subsequent FFT operation. This preliminary processing step reduces the amount of data that needs to be transformed, thereby reducing computational complexity while preserving detection accuracy

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

3Productivity

If DFS automatically selects frequency without radar detection, then more channels can be used, but false alarms occur due to WiFi traffic interference

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvechannel utilizationVSAvoiddetection accuracy
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The patent analyzes the local characteristics of the signal by examining correlation peaks in specific frequency regions. This local analysis approach enables differentiation between radar signals (which exhibit specific correlation peak patterns) and WiFi traffic (which lacks these patterns), reducing false alarms while maintaining channel utilization

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Solution Approach 2:

The patent changes the detection parameter from simple energy detection to correlation-based frequency domain analysis. By monitoring the correlation function's peak values and their frequency positions, the system can reliably distinguish radar signals from WiFi interference, improving detection accuracy without sacrificing channel availability

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Data Source

PatentUS12270929B2Systems and methods for long pulse radar chirp detector for LTE Licensed Assisted Access dynamic frequency selection
Publication Date: 2025.04.08 TELEFONAKTIEBOLAGET LM ERICSSON (PUBL)
  • US12270929B2 patent drawing
  • US12270929B2 patent drawing
  • US12270929B2 patent drawing

AI summary

According to certain embodiments, a method by a network node for linear chirp detection includes obtaining a first number, N, of samples of a signal. The samples are divided into at least a first group and a second group, where the first group includes a second number, D, of the samples of the signal and the second group includes a third number, N−D, of the samples of the signal. A correlation is performed between the first group of samples and the second group of samples to generate a resultant group of samples of the signal. Within the resultant group of samples, a peak value is identified in the frequency domain Based on at least one property associated with the peak value, it is determined whether there is a linear chirp within the signal.