Adaptive Radar Clutter Removal via Trajectory Analysis

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Traditional map-based clutter removal mechanisms in vehicle radar systems are unreliable, as they often erroneously identify moving objects as static clutter, leading to failure in detecting critical events like pedestrians entering the street, and waste resources by focusing on static objects.

Innovation Solution

Adaptive clutter removal methods that analyze radar scans in real-time using characteristics such as Doppler velocity, track uniformity, displacement vector, and point density to dynamically identify and flag static objects without relying on geometric map data, allowing the system to focus on moving objects.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Productivity

If map-based clutter removal is used to remove echoes from static objects, then processing efficiency is improved by filtering out static clutter, but reliability deteriorates because moving objects near static objects are erroneously removed

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveprocessing efficiencyVSAvoiddetection accuracy
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The patent transitions from static map-based clutter removal to dynamic trajectory-based clutter removal. By analyzing the motion trajectories of radar targets over multiple frames and comparing them with expected vehicle motion patterns, the system dynamically determines whether targets are clutter or valid moving objects. This resolves the contradiction by maintaining high processing efficiency while improving reliability through adaptive, real-time motion analysis.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The patent changes the basis for clutter identification from spatial parameters (map coordinates) to temporal parameters (trajectory characteristics, Doppler velocity, displacement vectors). By monitoring how target positions, velocities, and accelerations change over time, the system can distinguish between stationary clutter and moving objects even when they are spatially close, thereby maintaining processing efficiency while eliminating false removals.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

2Reliability

If all static objects are monitored and processed, then clutter removal coverage is improved, but processing complexity increases and system performance deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveclutter removal coverageVSAvoidprocessing complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent extracts only the essential characteristics needed for clutter identification (trajectory patterns, Doppler velocity, displacement vectors) from the full radar data set. By focusing computation on these key parameters rather than processing all raw radar returns for all potential clutter objects, the system achieves comprehensive clutter removal coverage while maintaining acceptable processing complexity and system performance.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent applies partial action by selectively processing only those radar targets that exhibit characteristics consistent with clutter (e.g., stationary or slowly moving targets with trajectories matching vehicle motion). Rather than uniformly processing all detected objects, the system applies simplified clutter removal logic to relevant targets, reducing overall processing complexity while maintaining reliable clutter removal coverage.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #16Partial or excessive action

3Ease of operation

If map data is used to identify clutter locations, then clutter identification is simplified, but accuracy deteriorates because map data may not reflect real-time object positions

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveclutter identification simplicityVSAvoidclutter identification accuracy
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSMeasurement precision

Solution Approach 1:

The patent implements feedback by continuously comparing radar-detected target trajectories with expected vehicle motion patterns and updating clutter identification decisions in real-time. This closed-loop approach maintains the simplicity of automated clutter identification while dramatically improving accuracy, as the system adapts to actual environmental conditions rather than relying on potentially outdated or inaccurate map data.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

This approach improves the accuracy and reliability of clutter removal, enhancing the vehicle's ability to detect moving objects and reduce processing complexity, thereby supporting safer navigation decisions.

Implementation Method 1

A characteristic indicative of a trajectory pattern relating to one or more respective sets of target points is obtained... the characteristic is determined by computing an average Doppler velocity between locations of the one or more respective sets of target points

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectDoppler effect: Doppler Effect

Data Source

PatentUS11366214B2Systems and methods for adaptive clutter removal from radar scans
Publication Date: 2022.06.21 WOVEN BY TOYOTA U S INC
  • US11366214B2 patent drawing
  • US11366214B2 patent drawing
  • US11366214B2 patent drawing

AI summary

Various embodiments of the present technology can include systems, methods, and non-transitory computer readable media configured to adaptively identify clutter points representing static objects from a sensor data scan. A plurality of sensor data scans are captured, by a sensor unit placed on a vehicle, at a plurality of consecutive time instants while the vehicle is traveling along a route. A set of target points from each of the plurality of sensor data scans is identified. A characteristic indicative of a trajectory pattern relating to one or more respective sets of target points is obtained from one or more sensor data scans taken at consecutive time instants. In response to determining that the characteristic satisfies a pre-defined condition, an indicator with the respective sets of target points is adopted as relating to one or more static objects in an environment at which the vehicle is situated.